Teams

An.Ashburn55C

2025 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.28 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-10-09vs Ca.Conzola55C6.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Ashburn / Rachel Pisciotta vs Christine Reinke / Julie Liddle1-6, 2-6
2025-10-02vs We.Sielaty55CWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Gupton / Ann Ashburn vs Evelyn Andino / Sharon Kucyk7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeanna Drescher / Cynthia White vs Tracy Lowrance / Wendy Sielaty6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlison Bernhardt / Jill Cramer vs Norma Wolcott / Jill Salstrand3-6, 1-6
2025-09-25vs Pa.Cochran55CWon 21
L#1 DoublesLori Bourne / Chandler Bastian vs Sarah Bell / Linda Eskridge4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDeanna Drescher / Jean Williams vs Regina Davis / Mary Ann Enzweiler7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVicki Fritsch / Ann Ashburn vs Judy Colby / Cathy Williams6-3, 6-3
2025-09-11Won 30
W#1 DoublesDeanna Drescher / Jean Williams vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Pisciotta / Ann Ashburn vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVicki Fritsch / Ann Garey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-04vs Sh.Cole55CLost 12
W#1 DoublesChandler Bastian / Rachel Pisciotta vs Kelly Huffstetler / Julee Knight7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Fogleman / Cynthia White vs Marylou Salmon / Vickie Fuller6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Gupton / Ann Ashburn vs Sharon Lambe / Janet Hammond3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-28vs Ca.Conzola55C6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Bourne / Chandler Bastian vs Laura Munster / Bryan Kern6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDeanna Drescher / Ann Ashburn vs Camille Conzola / Myra Peterson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Fogleman / Jill Cramer vs Hope Graney / Julie Liddle6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-25vs Di.Williams55CWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeanna Drescher / Jean Williams vs Elisebeth Gelardi / Diane Williams7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Gupton / Chandler Bastian vs Leslie Mahan / India Pleasants6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAlison Bernhardt / Ann Ashburn vs Melissa Hill / Marina Barthalmus0-6, 2-6
2025-08-21vs We.Sielaty55CLost 12
W#1 DoublesChandler Bastian / Rachel Pisciotta vs Jennifer Brock / Wendy Sielaty6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJean Williams / Karen Gupton vs Wendy Christensen / Mary Strothmann5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlison Bernhardt / Ann Garey vs Evelyn Andino / Jade Paunovich5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-08-14vs Pa.Cochran55CWon 20
W#1 DoublesChandler Bastian / Lori Bourne vs Sarah Bell / Linda Eskridge6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Fogleman / Ann Garey vs Eleanor Jones / Judy Colby6-2, 6-4
2025-07-31vs Sh.Cole55CLost 03
L#1 DoublesLori Bourne / Cynthia White vs Julee Knight / Janet Hammond4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Fogleman / Ann Garey vs Jodi Zorzi / Sharon Lambe5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRachel Pisciotta / Jill Cramer vs Gwen Noble / Vickie Fuller3-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Deanna Drescher
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Lori Bourne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Rachel Pisciotta
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.06
Jean Williams
published
3.04
Vicki Fritsch
published
3.04
Alison Bernhardt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Karen Gupton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.82
Jennifer Fogleman
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Ann Garey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Chandler Bastian
published 3
2.50
Ann Ashburn
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Fogleman + Alison Bernhardt122744% games−7.2% vs expected
Karen Gupton + Alison Bernhardt1634% games−19.1% vs expected
Deanna Drescher + Jennifer Fogleman10952% gamesnot enough data
Ann Ashburn + Karen Gupton3350% gamesnot enough data
Lori Bourne + Deanna Drescher2355% gamesnot enough data
Lori Bourne + Jennifer Fogleman2346% gamesnot enough data
Lori Bourne + Alison Bernhardt2342% gamesnot enough data
Deanna Drescher + Karen Gupton2345% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deanna Drescher
112W–101L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Lori Bourne
77W–80L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Rachel Pisciotta
108W–84L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Jean Williams
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Vicki Fritsch
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Alison Bernhardt
57W–97L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
3.5
Karen Gupton
63W–124L career · 4 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Jennifer Fogleman
65W–126L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Ann Garey
94W–72L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Chandler Bastian
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Ann Ashburn
19W–59L career · 7 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.