← Teams

IRV-LaBarca/Zawadzki

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Michelle Zawadzki
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.44
Kristen LaBarca
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Dana Nolan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Sharon Loomis-Malin
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.34
Heather Matteri
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Teresa Chan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Julie LaMontagne
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Char Riley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Nichole Anglin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Nina Sanna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Kelly Norling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Julia Plowman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.14
Colleen Walker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Blythe Knott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Wendy Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.02
Erin Gleason
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Jenny Marston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results11 ties
2025-09-13Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesSharon Loomis-Malin / Lynn Hendrix vs Leslie Hofferd / Jamie Hoesly6-2, 6-2
2025-09-12Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesSharon Loomis-Malin / Diane Camp vs Leona De Rocco / Linda Brummett6-4, 6-4
2025-09-11Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesSharon Loomis-Malin / Patti Dybdahl vs Mollie Gosselin / Micki Hulscher5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-07Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesKristen LaBarca / Sharon Loomis-Malin vs Rachel Ritchie / Kaie Wellman6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTeresa Chan vs Christina Melander6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Zawadzki / Char Riley vs Erin Casey / Lauren Larsen6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJenny Marston / Kelly Norling vs Teufelin Traylen / Shawn Sefchick6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-02Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesJulie LaMontagne / Kristen LaBarca vs Marcy Bernhardt / Julie Kafoury6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesDana Nolan vs Jen Lawrence7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesErin Gleason / Char Riley vs Melissa Jacobs / Jennifer Stevenson7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNichole Anglin / Colleen Walker vs Kathleen Cooney / Angie Cunningham6-4, 7-6
2025-02-22Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesMichelle Zawadzki / Dana Nolan vs Cathleen Lang / Michelle DeVaughn6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesJulie LaMontagne vs Linda Dallof6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesChar Riley / Kelly Norling vs Candy Dann / Karen Kraus6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStacey Burkhart / Nina Sanna vs Rose Lee / Elise D Harvey6-4, 6-0
2025-02-09Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesWendy Schmidt / Julie LaMontagne vs Kaie Wellman / Erin Casey7-6, 7-5
L#1 SinglesNichole Anglin vs Rachel Ritchie6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Norling / Stacey Burkhart vs Christine Bennett-Hanes / Shawn Sefchick6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesHeather Matteri / Kristen LaBarca vs Fiona Tait / Lauren Larsen3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-01-26Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesChar Riley / Michelle Zawadzki vs Jill Boyce / Ellen Hodges6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTeresa Chan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesColleen Walker / Julia Plowman vs Susan Elmer / Kim Tellin6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKelly Norling / Sharon Loomis-Malin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-01-19Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesSharon Loomis-Malin / Julie LaMontagne vs Kristi Tompkins / Kate Elliott6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDana Nolan vs Rachel Nies6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBlythe Knott / Wendy Schmidt vs Whitney Mam / Jane King Ayers6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesColleen Walker / Heather Matteri vs Josette Zervic / Susan Douglas6-2, 6-0
2025-01-12Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesJulie LaMontagne / Sharon Loomis-Malin vs Kathleen Murrin / Laura Shier6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesNichole Anglin vs Yukiko Namba6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Zawadzki / Kristen LaBarca vs Margo Yohner / Ann Cassin6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesErin Gleason / Julia Plowman vs Kerry Sanford / Betty Roux7-6, 5-5
2025-01-04Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesMichelle Zawadzki / Dana Nolan vs Jopie van Hameren / Nancy Collins1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJulie LaMontagne vs Xia Yuan6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHeather Matteri / Wendy Schmidt vs Barbara Dusicka / Katherine McMillan6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Jenny Marston vs Colleen Docktor / Lauren Mang6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Michelle Zawadzki
74W–33L career
0%81%19%
3.48
3.5
Kristen LaBarca
65W–38L career
0%90%10%
3.44
3.5
Dana Nolan
72W–25L career
0%96%4%
3.39
3.5
Sharon Loomis-Malin
60W–33L career
0%97%3%
3.35
3.5
Heather Matteri
58W–30L career
0%97%3%
3.34
3.5
Teresa Chan
61W–20L career
0%99%1%
3.33
3.5
Julie LaMontagne
85W–69L career
0%99%1%
3.31
3.5
Char Riley
37W–47L career
1%98%1%
3.27
3.5
Nichole Anglin
81W–65L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Nina Sanna
13W–39L career · type S
10%86%4%
3.23
3.5
Kelly Norling
68W–45L career
3%97%0%
3.21
3.5
Julia Plowman
73W–28L career
6%94%1%
3.20
3.5
Colleen Walker
58W–78L career
9%91%0%
3.14
3.5
Blythe Knott
22W–48L career
11%89%0%
3.14
3.5
Wendy Schmidt
41W–32L career
26%74%0%
3.06
3.5
Erin Gleason
43W–17L career
35%65%0%
3.02
3.5
Jenny Marston
11W–26L career
42%58%0%
2.99

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.