Teams

NITA W 75CWc Challenge (Kennedy/Mullady)

2023 NITA2 Winterz Combo · NITA Winter 7.5 Combo Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2023-04-30vs NITA W 75CWb Five Star (Delgrosso)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesEileen Gillstrom / Cindy Monahan vs Robin Dickerson / Claire Ralphs4-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesBecky Sharp / Susan Papiernik vs Jessica Baechle / Mary Ellen Young3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDiedre Castaldo / Cochita Jose vs Alicia Yaeger / Tracey Rubach6-7, 3-6
W#1 DoublesDiedre Castaldo / Cindy Monahan vs Joanne Sleezer / Angie Ulie3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAllycn Grcevic / Joy Mullady vs Lori Edwards / Kimberly Jesseman5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-26vs NITA W 75CWa TAM (Wright)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Wasylenko / Diedre Castaldo vs Rebecca Daly / Marjorie Baltazar6-7, 2-4
L#2 DoublesCochita Jose / Jessica Urban vs Jennifer Peck / Julie Hahn3-6, 4-5
W#3 DoublesCindy Monahan / Zagorka James vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesZagorka James / Allycn Grcevic vs Cherie Vick / Katie Jones7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Wasylenko / Diedre Castaldo vs Mary Baker / Donna Wilson5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEileen Gillstrom / Susan Papiernik vs Salve Messina / Kristin Brown2-6, 5-7
2023-03-28vs NITA W 75CWa TAM (Wright)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCatherine Wasylenko / Allycn Grcevic vs Martha Davis / Julie Hahn3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCindy Monahan / Becky Sharp vs Rebecca Daly / Rochelle Probst7-6, 3-2
L#3 DoublesSusan Papiernik / Cochita Jose vs Sophia Koliatsis / Denise Lam0-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesAllycn Grcevic / Catherine Wasylenko vs Donna Wilson / Carla Page3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoy Mullady / Susan Papiernik vs Kristin Brown / Cherie Vick1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBecky Sharp / Cochita Jose vs Julie Boruff / Salve Messina2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesZagorka James / Allycn Grcevic vs Nancy Williford / Diane Fonte6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCochita Jose / Jessica Urban vs Meijan Linda Yu / Jill Odenbeck2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBecky Sharp / Joy Mullady vs Catherine Golz / Teri Ayotte6-4, 6-4
2023-02-12vs NITA W 75CWb Five Star (Delgrosso)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAllycn Grcevic / Zagorka James vs Erika Baka / Dorothy OMalley6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBecky Sharp / Stacy Fox vs Jessica Baechle / Tracey Rubach4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCindy Monahan / Cochita Jose vs Christine Lee / Shilpa Iyer3-6, 5-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesZagorka James / Allycn Grcevic vs Meijan Linda Yu / Jill Odenbeck3-6, 3-5
W#2 DoublesJessica Urban / Cochita Jose vs Kathleen Leahy / Jan MacK6-3, 5-4
W#3 DoublesEileen Gillstrom / Cindy Monahan vs Catherine Golz / Nancy Williford4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 DoublesZagorka James / Stacy Fox vs Valerie Nagel / Ella Lord6-4, 4-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJessica Urban / Cochita Jose vs Janine Stalcup / Melissa Held3-6, 4-5
W#3 DoublesMara Morris / Eileen Gillstrom vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · NITA Winter 7.5 Combo Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA W 75CWa TAM (Wright)8223716163
2NITA W 75CWb Five Star (Delgrosso)82201023215
3NITA W 75CWc Challenge (Kennedy/Mullady)55141638275
4NITA W 75CWf Naperville 2 (Wilson/Parse)46141636273
5NITA W 75CWd Norris (Sleezer/Prendergast)37111940261
6NITA W 75CWe Naperville 1 (Martinez)2882245288

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Catherine Wasylenko
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Diedre Castaldo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Zagorka James
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.28
Allycn Grcevic
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.24
Cindy Monahan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Eileen Gillstrom
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
Becky Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.67
Cochita Jose
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jessica Urban
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joy Mullady
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mara Morris
published
Stacy Fox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Papiernik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allycn Grcevic + Eileen Gillstrom8265% games+24.5% vs expected
Catherine Wasylenko + Allycn Grcevic8653% games+9.8% vs expected
Cindy Monahan + Eileen Gillstrom7355% games+6.4% vs expected
Zagorka James + Catherine Wasylenko16656% games+4.5% vs expected
Zagorka James + Allycn Grcevic11751% games+0.4% vs expected
Zagorka James + Becky Sharp6550% games−0.6% vs expected
Allycn Grcevic + Becky Sharp3643% games−4.3% vs expected
Catherine Wasylenko + Diedre Castaldo3649% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Wasylenko
102W–88L career · 4 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Diedre Castaldo
49W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Zagorka James
290W–179L career · 6 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.47
3.5
Allycn Grcevic
148W–127L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Cindy Monahan
71W–86L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Eileen Gillstrom
43W–60L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Becky Sharp
89W–152L career · 5 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Cochita Jose
25W–82L career · 8 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
2.67
Jessica Urban
15W–16L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joy Mullady
51W–85L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mara Morris
21W–36L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stacy Fox
34W–23L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Papiernik
22W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.