Teams

Peterson

2026 Adult 55 & Over- NAZ · NAZ 55&over 7.0M

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-04vs CohenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTodd Gillenwater / James Kirk vs Eli Cohen / Bob Guzley2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDon Blair / Rich Stephens vs Bryan Cooperrider / Dennis Swearingen6-1, 6-2
2026-07-03vs CohenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTodd Gillenwater / James Kirk vs Eli Cohen / Bryan Cooperrider3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Chan / Rich Stephens vs Craig Bearchell / Dennis Swearingen3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-07-02vs CohenLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Chan / Todd Gillenwater vs Craig Bearchell / Dennis Swearingen6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJames Kirk / Rich Stephens vs Eli Cohen / Bob Guzley4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSteve Boadway / Gary Petersen vs Bryan Cooperrider / Steven Riggs3-6, 4-6
2026-07-01vs CohenLost 02
L#2 DoublesSteve Boadway / Gary Petersen vs Bob Guzley / Steven Riggs2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDon Blair / Rich Stephens vs Eli Cohen / Bryan Cooperrider4-6, 4-6
2026-06-11vs CohenWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Chan / Todd Gillenwater vs Craig Bearchell / Bob Guzley1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Kirk / Rich Stephens vs Bryan Cooperrider / Dennis Swearingen6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDon Blair / Steve Boadway vs Eli Cohen / Steven Riggs2-6, 1-6
2026-06-10vs CohenLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Chan / Todd Gillenwater vs Craig Bearchell / Dennis Swearingen6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJames Kirk / Rich Stephens vs Bob Guzley / Steven Riggs2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGary Petersen / Steve Boadway vs Eli Cohen / Bryan Cooperrider3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · NAZ 55&over 7.0M
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cohen4210820158
2Peterson2461227171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Rich Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.18
Steve Boadway
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Gary Petersen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Don Blair
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Todd Gillenwater
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gary Petersen + Steve Boadway033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rich Stephens
19W–52L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
3.35
Steve Boadway
0W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.18
3
Gary Petersen
8W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Don Blair
17W–23L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
Todd Gillenwater
4W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.