Teams

Fogleman/Titzer 7.5 Combo 55s Fri AM

2023 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · Women 7.5 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesTeresa Tolin / Kim Hunt vs Tammy Pugh / Christine Osteen6-2, 7-6
2023-09-22vs Boger/Pardue 7.5 Combo 55s Fri AMWon 10
W#2 DoublesKim Hunt / Teresa Tolin vs Pamela Smith / Susan Pardue6-0, 7-5
2023-09-15Won 10
W#2 DoublesKim Hunt / Teresa Tolin vs Kari Craig / Nancy Willis6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-08-18vs Boger/Pardue 7.5 Combo 55s Fri AMWon 10
W#2 DoublesKim Hunt / Mary Jane Tarver vs Mary Beth Ebert / Anne Hendrix6-3, 7-5
2023-08-16vs COLE 7.5 Combo 55s Fri AMLost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Hunt / Mary Jane Tarver vs Kathy Hedgecock / Ginger Hayworth6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Catherine Tanner
published 4
3.68
Karen Robinson
published
3.61
Kim Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.47
Julie Spence
published
3.46
Mary Jane Tarver
published
3.41
Grace Titzer
published 3.5
3.40
Mary Sexton
published
3.32
Martha Fogleman
published
3.30
Laura Vary
published
3.25
Lora Farlow
published
3.14
Teresa Tolin
published
3.11
Toni Lewis
published
Mindy Hedrick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Fogleman + Toni Lewis2451% games+7.0% vs expected
Teresa Tolin + Karen Robinson123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Spence + Toni Lewis213 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Tanner + Toni Lewis123 matchesnot enough data
Karen Robinson + Toni Lewis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Tanner
41W–39L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Karen Robinson
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Kim Hunt
222W–161L career · 5 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
Julie Spence
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
Mary Jane Tarver
20W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Grace Titzer
12W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.41
Mary Sexton
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.40
Martha Fogleman
24W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
Laura Vary
23W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.30
Lora Farlow
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.25
Teresa Tolin
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.14
Toni Lewis
12W–23L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Mindy Hedrick
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.