← Teams

N OR-VTC-Pickering

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
David Sturdyvin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.95
Thomas McGirk
published 4.5
3.84
Francisco Rivera-Giusti
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.77
Lorna Goth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Michael Kazangian
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.42
Karen Pickering
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.21
Dayna Porter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2025-05-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesThomas McGirk / Karen Pickering vs Damon Ogden / Nenette Olson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFrancisco Rivera-Giusti / Lorna Goth vs John Heim / Jenny Pizot3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Kazangian / Cheryl Hopkins vs Timothy Johnson / Tammy Brennan6-4, 6-3
2025-05-04Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesFrancisco Rivera-Giusti / Lorna Goth vs Frank Shen / Leigh Anderson7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Sturdyvin / Cheryl Hopkins vs Robert Truong / Jing Feng4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Kazangian / Dayna Porter vs William Wang / Catherine Go6-1, 6-3
2025-05-03Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesLorna Goth / Francisco Rivera-Giusti vs Heike Droste / Joerg Droste6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Pickering / Michael Kazangian vs Maria Kosmetatos / James Horen6-2, 6-3
2025-04-27Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesFrancisco Rivera-Giusti / Lorna Goth vs James Raleigh / Julie Hansen6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Kazangian / Cheryl Hopkins vs Paul Harwood / Laura Rundle6-1, 6-2
2025-04-26Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesThomas McGirk / Karen Pickering vs John Biagioli / Theresa Biagioli6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Kazangian / RENEE VANDEGRIEND vs John Heim / Janet Mills6-4, 6-4
2025-04-19Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDavid Sturdyvin / RENEE VANDEGRIEND vs Paul Stutzman / Claire Thayer2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Kazangian / Dayna Porter vs Jason Dortch / Kristi Vargas7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesFrancisco Rivera-Giusti / Cheryl Hopkins vs James Horen / Judith Kobin7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-05Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesThomas McGirk / Karen Pickering vs Robert Truong / Jing Feng4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesFrancisco Rivera-Giusti / Dayna Porter vs Steve Sun / Linda Lovett7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Kazangian / Lorna Goth vs Frank Shen / Rie Sasakawa3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-03-30Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesThomas McGirk / Karen Pickering vs Jonathan Caplan / Toni Kidd7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesFrancisco Rivera-Giusti / Lorna Goth vs Clark Cosart / Babette Zielinski6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
David Sturdyvin
45W–34L career
1%99%0%
4.15
4.5
Thomas McGirk
56W–73L career
25%75%0%
3.95
4
Francisco Rivera-Giusti
126W–98L career
0%99%1%
3.84
4
Lorna Goth
124W–51L career
1%99%0%
3.77
4
Michael Kazangian
72W–54L career
2%98%0%
3.70
3.5
Karen Pickering
156W–123L career
0%95%5%
3.42
3.5
Dayna Porter
81W–74L career
2%98%0%
3.21

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.