Teams

IA/Widder-Wilker/55&Over7.0M

2026 IA 55 & Over Adult League · 7.0 M 55 Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-03vs Smith/ButcherLost 12
L#1 DoublesRaymond Widder / Max Wilker vs Tom Slininger / Charles Mahoski6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMatthew Whipps / Albert Lu vs Patrick O'Leary / Scott Teasdale6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMark Davidson / Wayne Goedken vs Kevin Nebergall / John Stierman5-7, 2-6
2026-04-19vs Carstensen/NicholsWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Shay / John Micka vs Tom Randall / Brian Steffen6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKeith Buck / Mark Richards vs Philip Wasta / STEVEN KNIERIM6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Karrmann / Wayne Goedken vs Dana Nichols / Steven Odegaard3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-02-22vs Hightshoe/InfeltWon 30
W#1 DoublesMax Wilker / John Micka vs Jeff Dotson / Jeff Hightshoe6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Whipps / Mark Richards vs Tommy Banks / Randy Kirchner6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Karrmann / Wayne Goedken vs Mike Nelson / RANDY RICHARDS6-4, 6-3
2025-12-14vs PackWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Micka / Max Wilker vs Tim Brunkhorst / Brahim Bouhaik7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKeith Buck / Mark Richards vs Kent Christensen / Dean Scheffert6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMark Davidson / Raymond Widder vs Chris Carrier / Richard Updegraff6-1, 6-3
2025-11-09vs Carstensen/NicholsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Micka / Max Wilker vs Douglas Allemang / Steven Odegaard6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMatthew Whipps / Mark Richards vs Patrick Cosgrove / Dana Nichols6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMark Davidson / Raymond Widder vs Daryl Patten / Tim Koopmann6-0, 6-1
2025-10-19vs Smith/ButcherWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Micka / Max Wilker vs Scott Teasdale / Paul Smith6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKeith Buck / Albert Lu vs Ronald Butcher / Kevin Nebergall6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChris Shay / Wayne Goedken vs Christopher Bryant / Robert Thomasson6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2025-10-03vs PackWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Micka / Max Wilker vs Sean McMahon / Andy Prosser6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKeith Buck / Mark Richards vs Eric Pack / Benjamin Lehnen6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlbert Lu / Raymond Widder vs Chris Carrier / Jeff Monson6-4, 6-3
2025-09-14vs Hightshoe/InfeltWon 20
W#1 DoublesMax Wilker / John Karrmann vs Jeff Hightshoe / Jeff Dotson6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRaymond Widder / John Micka vs Tommy Banks / Randy Kirchner6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.0 M 55 Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Widder-Wilker/55&Over7.0M712227131
2Smith/Butcher62141023220
3Pack44111331239
4Hightshoe/Infelt2661839254
5Carstensen/Nichols1771739256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Matthew Whipps
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.53
John Micka
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.53
Max Wilker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
John Karrmann
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Raymond Widder
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.33
Chris Shay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Mark Davidson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Wayne Goedken
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Albert Lu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Keith Buck
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Mark Richards
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Max Wilker + John Micka9170% games+8.1% vs expected
John Karrmann + Max Wilker12460% games−1.6% vs expected
Wayne Goedken + Max Wilker213 matchesnot enough data
Mark Davidson + Raymond Widder303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Whipps
63W–57L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
John Micka
61W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.53
Max Wilker
64W–32L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
John Karrmann
30W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
Raymond Widder
27W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Chris Shay
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.33
Mark Davidson
10W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
Wayne Goedken
14W–28L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.16
3
Albert Lu
16W–18L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.87
Keith Buck
25W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Richards
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.