Teams

Cox, Chris

2024 Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 8.0 Combo - Men - 55

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-06-30vs Pucci, MichaelWon 30
W#1 DoublesRonald Dreher / Stephen Lunsford vs Michael Pucci / Trevor Holsinger6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSteven Osborne / Chris Cox vs Jeff Taylor / Norman Friedman3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid May / Gregory Russell vs Gib Benschoter / Jeffrey Spivak6-4, 6-2
2024-06-02vs Pucci, MichaelWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Cox / Steven Osborne vs Kirk Blinzler / Jeffrey Spivak6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRonald Dreher / Pete Jackson vs Henry Arst / Norman Friedman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKenneth Havens / Lanny Wake vs Gregory Smith / Jeff Taylor7-6, 2-5, 1-0
2024-04-28vs Pucci, MichaelLost 03
L#1 DoublesKenneth Havens / Dave Walterscheid vs Kirk Blinzler / Jeffrey Spivak6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTerry Jackson / Pete Jackson vs Joe Lucas / Jeff Taylor4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRonald Dreher / Terry Funk vs Norman Friedman / Trevor Holsinger6-7, 5-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Combo - Men - 55 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chris Cox
published 4
Dave Walterscheid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
David May
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Kenneth Havens
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.63
Gregory Russell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Ronald Dreher
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Pete Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lanny Wake
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stephen Lunsford
published
Steven Osborne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Terry Funk
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Terry Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David May + Gregory Russell5257% gamesnot enough data
Steven Osborne + Chris Cox314 matchesnot enough data
David May + Terry Jackson314 matchesnot enough data
Pete Jackson + Terry Jackson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Cox
40W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Dave Walterscheid
26W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
David May
40W–37L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
Kenneth Havens
49W–58L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Gregory Russell
24W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.63
Ronald Dreher
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.57
Pete Jackson
37W–65L career · 4 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.56
Lanny Wake
24W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Lunsford
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Osborne
39W–33L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Terry Funk
16W–22L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Terry Jackson
31W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.