Teams

SDNC 4.0 Lomas Santa Fe CC (3:1)/ Lin

2023 Adult 40 & Over Winter- SDNC WD · SDNC - Women - 4.0 WD

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 SinglesAnn Kelter vs Clara Huerta1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesCatherine Pla / Carey Cimino vs Mary Ann Neder / Yolanda Christensen3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Kelter / Anne Reese vs Christina Cortes / Sachiko Inoue7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Reeves / Catherine Pla vs Catherine Baird / Lori Merino4-6, 1-6
2023-03-13vs SDNC 4.0 Morgan Run (2:2)/ FritzWon 10
W#1 DoublesIsabelle Guy / Catherine Pla vs Kristin Adams / Julie Swartz7-6, 6-2
2023-03-06Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAnn Kelter / Haruko Vajda vs Jennifer Waldron / Julie Howard6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesIsabelle Guy / Ann Kelter vs Dominique Gambale / Michelle Granieri6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-02-27vs SDNC 4.0 RB CTC (2:2)/ OrtizLost 02
L#1 SinglesHaruko Vajda vs Joan Rogers3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHonor Krutsinger / Ann Kelter vs Connie Balen / Patricia Sherman6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2023-02-20vs SDNC LLW 4.0 Surf and Turf/ MosesLost 01
L#3 DoublesIsabelle Guy / Catherine Pla vs Katie Winship / Jessica Mills5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-02-09vs SDNC 4.0 FRCC (2:2)/ TexeiraLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Kelter / Anne Reese vs Kimberly Krenek / Lisa Shulman6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHonor Krutsinger / Catherine Pla vs Rhianna Thompson / Diana Ortuno6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carey Cimino
published 4
3.60
Catherine Pla
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.59
Anne Reese
published 4
3.58
Kay Lin
published
3.57
Janet Hoover
published
3.51
Haruko Vajda
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Ann Kelter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Lisa Michaels
published
Isabelle Guy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kay Lin + Janet Hoover1643% games+0.8% vs expected
Ann Kelter + Anne Reese404 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Pla + Ann Kelter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carey Cimino
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Catherine Pla
40W–57L career · 5 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Anne Reese
17W–22L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.59
Kay Lin
8W–23L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Janet Hoover
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Haruko Vajda
165W–125L career · 2 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Ann Kelter
86W–101L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.41
Lisa Michaels
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Isabelle Guy
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.