Teams

HMahgoub/DMichael (PCC)

2026 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-21vs MFiddes (Raintree)Won 20
W#2 SinglesHani Mahgoub vs Mark Fiddes6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesTim Rodriguez vs John Causey4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-07-06vs KFranks (PPRSC)Lost 02
L#2 SinglesAlexander Killeffer vs Alven Weil3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesRaul Zamudio vs Kent Franks2-6, 0-6
2026-06-29vs EOBrien (WSRC)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesRaul Zamudio vs Vladislav Valtsis2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTim Rodriguez vs Alberto Botero3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesPhilip Heidkamp vs Eric O'Brien0-6, 1-6
2026-06-22vs DBarden (Mountainbrook)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesAlexander Killeffer vs Heyward Bouknight4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBrian Burnett vs Tai Kam2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesPhilip Heidkamp vs Bill Helman3-6, 6-7
2026-06-15vs MThompson (Windyrush)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesPhilip Heidkamp vs Ian Klass1-6, 0-6
2026-06-08vs LEvansek (Blakeney)Split 11
L#2 SinglesRaul Zamudio vs Ganesh Pallem1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesHani Mahgoub vs Rishi Gogate6-4, 6-1
2026-06-07vs CRabidou (Carmel)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesDavid Michael vs Christopher Rabidou7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAlexander Killeffer vs Mark Krasniewski7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesTim Rodriguez vs Scott Hansen6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KFranks (PPRSC)34101124193
2DBarden (Mountainbrook)3481326197
3EOBrien (WSRC)3491227198
4MFiddes (Raintree)2581328204
5HMahgoub/DMichael (PCC)1631837238

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
David Michael
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Alexander Killeffer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Hani Mahgoub
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
3.09
Tim Rodriguez
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.98
Raul Zamudio
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.85
Brian Burnett
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.68
Philip Heidkamp
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Michael
10W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Alexander Killeffer
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
3
Hani Mahgoub
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.22
Tim Rodriguez
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.09
Raul Zamudio
0W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Brian Burnett
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%87%13%
2.85
Philip Heidkamp
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.