Teams

Wrc/Estrada

2026 Broward Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-24vs Sunrise/DeAndreisWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnkur Kapoor / Philippe Chelle vs Fabian Centeno / Leonardo Fabian Posadas6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMauricio Camacho / Roberto Nieves vs Carlos Cadet / LUIS HERNANDEZ6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSantiago Restrepo / Michael Kamrad vs Jorge Evaristo / Moises Humberto Abraham Aguirre6-3, 6-2
2026-08-22vs Midtown/OrellanaWon 21
L#1 DoublesGustavo Risquez / JOSE F MENDEZ vs John Jimenez / Abelardo Gutierrez4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCeferino Estrada / Roberto Nieves vs Enrique Bonifaz / Aldri Franco6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSantiago Restrepo / Michael Kamrad vs ALEJANDRO PERNIAS / Fernando MacHado6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wrc/Estrada000000
2Midtown/Orellana000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Santiago Restrepo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.92
Philippe Chelle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Roberto Nieves
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Gustavo Risquez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Ankur Kapoor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Ruben Ojeda
published
3.41
Ceferino Estrada
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Mauricio Camacho
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
JOSE F MENDEZ
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Michael Kamrad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mauricio Camacho + Ankur Kapoor4259% games+13.0% vs expected
Ankur Kapoor + Ruben Ojeda4165% games+6.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Santiago Restrepo
36W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.96
Philippe Chelle
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
Roberto Nieves
25W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Gustavo Risquez
206W–175L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.78
3.5
Ankur Kapoor
19W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.48
Ruben Ojeda
20W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Ceferino Estrada
95W–98L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.41
3.5
Mauricio Camacho
156W–115L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
JOSE F MENDEZ
2W–3L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
3%95%2%
3.25
Michael Kamrad
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.