Teams

IND-ParkFit Peak Combo

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 MEN

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-25vs PC-GavinoWon 21
W#1 DoublesZane Schafer / Pat Nevin vs Walter Josephson / Roman Gavino6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesChester Richey / Richard Dean Hendrickson vs Revell Coy / Moe Davari6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEric Seaman / Tim Kast vs Bart Munson / Mark Sullivan6-0, 6-3
2025-10-25vs EW-IND-MehlenbacherSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJerry Henderson / Kevin Collins vs Wayne Kohan / Don Donais2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesClinton Marvel / Zane Schafer vs Adam Hrebeniuk / Larry Bagaasen6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-24vs PC-GavinoWon 21
W#1 DoublesClinton Marvel / Zane Schafer vs Moe Davari / Revell Coy1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBill Schoultz / Pat Nevin vs Walter Josephson / Roman Gavino6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAndrew Anderson / Richard Dean Hendrickson vs Mark Sullivan / Bart Munson6-3, 6-1
2025-10-24vs EW-IND-MehlenbacherWon 21
W#1 DoublesEric Seaman / Tim Kast vs Kent Ozkardesh / Bryan Coles6-3, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChester Richey / Richard Dean Hendrickson vs Wayne Kohan / Ivan Guevara2-4
L#3 DoublesKevin Collins / Jerry Henderson vs Don Donais / Evan Mehlenbacher3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Zane Schafer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Pat Nevin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Richard Dean Hendrickson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Andrew Anderson
published 3.5
Bruno Caprez
published 3.5
Chester Richey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Tim Kast
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Clinton Marvel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Bill Schoultz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Jerry Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Eric Seaman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
James Cramer
published
John Reopelle
published
Kevin Collins
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Dean Hendrickson + Tim Kast4264% games+14.0% vs expected
Chester Richey + Bill Schoultz5061% games+6.9% vs expected
Pat Nevin + Bill Schoultz6654% games+3.9% vs expected
Jerry Henderson + Clinton Marvel7750% games−5.0% vs expected
Jerry Henderson + Bill Schoultz71045% games−6.9% vs expected
Kevin Collins + Clinton Marvel4846% games−9.3% vs expected
Kevin Collins + Jerry Henderson7552% games−11.5% vs expected
Kevin Collins + Pat Nevin61246% games−11.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zane Schafer
38W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Pat Nevin
78W–108L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Richard Dean Hendrickson
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Andrew Anderson
6W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Bruno Caprez
4W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Chester Richey
16W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tim Kast
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Clinton Marvel
46W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Bill Schoultz
34W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.10
Jerry Henderson
54W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
Eric Seaman
46W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
James Cramer
19W–36L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
John Reopelle
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kevin Collins
29W–52L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.