Teams

MILL VALLEY 18AM4.5A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.5

27 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Matt Dunn
published
4.32
Taylor Angel
published
4.30
Augusto Acosta
published 4.5
4.30
Paul Stiff
published
Andrew Mercy
published 4.5
Courtenay MacOmber
published 4.5
4.24
Jim Humes
published
4.19
Mike Natenshon
published
4.17
Jacques Soenens
published
4.14
Andrew MacKay
published 4.5
4.13
Steven Morrow
published
4.13
James Milligan
published
3.99
Joe Hiti
published
3.97
Brian Kneafsey
published 4.5
3.94
Kevin Knowles
published
3.93
Frank Young
published
3.85
Maximillian Armour
published
3.84
Kenneth Austin
published
3.81
Leo Bersamina
published
3.81
Roark Vandien
published
3.62
Mark Shaw
published
Eric Issadore
published
Lane Shackleton
published
Michael Ellis
published
Onno Koelman
published
Robert Blechman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maximillian Armour + Mark Shaw3255% gamesnot enough data
Brian Kneafsey + Jacques Soenens303 matchesnot enough data
Augusto Acosta + Matt Dunn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matt Dunn
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
4.41
Taylor Angel
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Augusto Acosta
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
Paul Stiff
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Andrew Mercy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Christopher Ruiz Chiu
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Courtenay MacOmber
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jim Humes
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.24
Mike Natenshon
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
Jacques Soenens
15W–7L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Andrew MacKay
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
4.14
Steven Morrow
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
4.13
James Milligan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
4.13
Joe Hiti
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.99
4.5
Brian Kneafsey
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.97
Kevin Knowles
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
Frank Young
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
3.93
Maximillian Armour
12W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.85
Kenneth Austin
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.84
Leo Bersamina
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Roark Vandien
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Mark Shaw
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
Eric Issadore
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lane Shackleton
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Ellis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Onno Koelman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Blechman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.