Teams

Agran: Lifetime

2025 IA 18 & Over Adult League · 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.67 / IOWA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-08vs IA/Brown-Gross/18&Over2.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Licht / Dilia Mayo vs Sara Diekelmann / Joan Jensen6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesChristine Woody vs Jinfeng Chen4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKate van Haaften / Hannah Agran vs Courtney Suarez / Deborah Fleagle1-6, 2-6
2025-02-08vs Rose & Bischoff: DMGCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHannah Agran / Dilia Mayo vs Kristin Rose / Jenny Merryman1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Cortese / Christine Woody vs Eileen Wixted / Sarah Morton6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-01-25vs Morgan & Maters: DMGCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaria Ruhtenberg / Lori Hanson vs Christen Bliss / Mimi Paulsen4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Licht vs Annie Reynolds6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDilia Mayo / Kate van Haaften vs Heather Brown / Andria Klinefeldt1-6, 4-6
2024-12-13vs Brown: GenesisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDilia Mayo / Maria Ruhtenberg vs Krista Becker / Teri Patrick6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKate van Haaften vs Abby Sensenig2-6, 1-6
2024-11-22vs Jordan & Bonner: GenesisLost 12
L#1 DoublesDiana Kautzky / Kate van Haaften vs Erin Strawn / Erin Mullin1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAudrey Jones vs Kate Reis1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMaria Ruhtenberg / Christine Woody vs Audra Bonner / Keri Farrell-Kolb6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IA/Brown-Gross/18&Over2.5W5011412114
2Jordan & Bonner: Genesis4110513100
3Morgan & Maters: DMGCC329612117
4Rose & Bischoff: DMGCC238715113
5Brown: Genesis1421326160
6Agran: Lifetime0551021147

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christine Woody
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.73
Dilia Mayo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.38
Maria Ruhtenberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Audrey Jones
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Diana Kautzky
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Diane Cortese
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.94
Hannah Agran
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.94
Amy Licht
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
Kate van Haaften
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate van Haaften + Hannah Agran0525% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christine Woody
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dilia Mayo
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Maria Ruhtenberg
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
2.5
Audrey Jones
0W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Diana Kautzky
0W–3L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Diane Cortese
6W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Hannah Agran
1W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
2.5
Amy Licht
2W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Kate van Haaften
0W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.