Teams

Jo.Hulicki40S

2026 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-26vs Ch.Nystrom40SLost 02
L#1 SinglesSpence Huffstetler vs David Harris0-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesHarold Rabinovitz vs William Slocum4-6, 6-2
2026-07-19vs Do.Marks40SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSpence Huffstetler vs Jonathan Drum3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJohn Hulicki vs Douglas Marks6-3, 6-3
2026-07-17vs Li.Larson40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesSpence Huffstetler vs Casey Smith6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesHarold Rabinovitz vs Gregory McKenna6-4, 6-3
2026-07-05vs Ad.Whitesell40SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSpence Huffstetler vs Robert Zimardo6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJohn Hulicki vs Andrew DeLorme2-6, 2-6
2026-06-25vs Ch.Nystrom40SWon 20
W#2 SinglesJohn Hulicki vs Patrick Webb7-6, 6-3
W#3 SinglesHarold Rabinovitz vs Scott Clark6-3, 6-3
2026-06-14vs Do.Marks40SWon 20
W#1 SinglesJohn Hulicki vs Douglas Marks7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMark Wood vs Scott Hoffman6-4, 6-3
2026-06-07vs Li.Larson40SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSpence Huffstetler vs Demar Neal6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJohn Hulicki vs Harrison Fell3-6, 4-6
2026-05-31vs Ad.Whitesell40SLost 02
L#2 SinglesStephen Cole vs Adam Whitesell0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesHarold Rabinovitz vs Royce Burns4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ad.Whitesell40S7120411130
2Do.Marks40S4391226192
3Jo.Hulicki40S35101429237
4Li.Larson40S3591533241
5Ch.Nystrom40S2581327193

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
John Hulicki
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.37
Mark Wood
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Spence Huffstetler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Stephen Cole
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Harold Rabinovitz
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Cole + John Hulicki314 matchesnot enough data
Spence Huffstetler + John Hulicki224 matchesnot enough data
Mark Wood + John Hulicki213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
John Hulicki
162W–115L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
Mark Wood
15W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Spence Huffstetler
65W–73L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Stephen Cole
68W–61L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3
Harold Rabinovitz
18W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.