Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Bracken

2022 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 3.0M

11 players · average NTRP 3.44 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-01-07vs Liberty Park-VisserWon 10
W#2 Male DoublesDan Murray / Nick Rowe vs Michael Fordham / Endhi Visser6-0, 6-3
2022-12-17vs Sports Mall-Bachman/RozsaWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesNick Rowe / Reyn Soffe vs JOSEPH BROWN / Dean Bachman6-4, 5-3
2022-12-03vs Salt Lake Tennis-HellerSplit 11
W#1 Male DoublesReyn Soffe / Justin Bracken vs Briton McConkie / Eric Barnhill6-4, 7-6
L#2 Male DoublesEric Salmanson / Dali Licul vs Matthew Coleman / Myles Ozo2-6, 4-6
2022-11-17vs Sports Mall-NelsonWon 10
W#2 Male DoublesDan Murray / Nick Rowe vs Bradley Holmes / BART SHARP6-3, 6-3
2022-11-12vs Cottonwood Club-Arico/RuprechtWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesNicholas Ujifusa / Reyn Soffe vs Shawn Hazen / Ben Haverkost6-0, 6-2
2022-11-05vs Liberty Park Tennis-BalchWon 10
W#1 Male DoublesThomas Good / Nick Rowe vs Shawn Lay / Chris Porter6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Nicholas Ujifusa
published 4
3.46
Thomas Good
published
Eric Christensen
published 3.5
3.24
Nick Rowe
usually #1 Male Doubles 50%, also #2 Male Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Dali Licul
usually #2 Male Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.03
Carl Culver
published 3.5
3.02
Jack Pendergast
published 3
3.00
Reyn Soffe
usually #1 Male Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Dan Murray
published 3
Justin Bracken
published
Travis Charbonneau
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nick Rowe + Thomas Good5169% gamesnot enough data
Carl Culver + Dali Licul6060% gamesnot enough data
Nick Rowe + Reyn Soffe3259% gamesnot enough data
Nicholas Ujifusa + Reyn Soffe404 matchesnot enough data
Dan Murray + Dali Licul314 matchesnot enough data
Nick Rowe + Dali Licul213 matchesnot enough data
Justin Bracken + Thomas Good303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Nicholas Ujifusa
115W–53L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Thomas Good
61W–24L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Eric Christensen
8W–41L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Nick Rowe
50W–34L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Dali Licul
64W–37L career · 1 line in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Carl Culver
51W–41L career · type A · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
3
Jack Pendergast
36W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%44%56%
3.02
3.5
Reyn Soffe
59W–37L career · 3 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Dan Murray
109W–127L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
2.96
Justin Bracken
24W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Travis Charbonneau
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.