Teams

MARION/Drawdy/Women/8.5

2022 Marion Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.30 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-04vs FK - SteedSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDebby Watts / Debbie Reyna vs Lisa Steed / Jennifer Boyd6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLeigh Chak / Tanner Watts vs Amanda Miller / Amy Graham6-2, 7-5
2022-11-26vs FK - SteedWon 20
W#1 DoublesCammie McLeod / Jennifer Hewitson vs Amy Graham / Eileen Lombardo7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDebby Watts / Debbie Reyna vs Lisa Steed / Jennifer Boyd6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-11-18vs FK - SteedLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristy Ulbricht / Jennifer Hewitson vs Amanda Miller / Gabriela Sullivan5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeigh Chak / Diana Royo vs Lisa Steed / Amy Graham6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCammie McLeod / Nicole Wigelsworth vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-11-13vs FK - SteedWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeigh Chak / Diana Royo vs Cheryl Brent / Pamela Plumlee6-1, 1-1
W#2 DoublesCammie McLeod / Nicole Wigelsworth vs Amy Graham / Jennifer Boyd6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2022-11-04vs FK - SteedWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiana Royo / Christy Ulbricht vs Eileen Lombardo / Jessica Bonano6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2022-10-28vs FK - SteedLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristy Ulbricht / Debby Watts vs Cheryl Brent / Eileen Lombardo6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeigh Chak / Nicole Wigelsworth vs Lisa Steed / Jennifer Boyd7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-10-15vs FK - SteedWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristy Ulbricht / Jennifer Hewitson vs Pamela Plumlee / Gabriela Sullivan6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDebby Watts / Debbie Reyna vs Amy Graham / Eileen Lombardo2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cammie McLeod
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Debbie Reyna
published 4.5
4.24
Christy Ulbricht
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Diana Royo
published 4
3.89
Tanner Watts
published
3.81
Debby Watts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jennifer Hewitson
published
Leigh Chak
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Ulbricht + Debby Watts7651% gamesnot enough data
Leigh Chak + Debbie Reyna5256% gamesnot enough data
Leigh Chak + Cammie McLeod2353% gamesnot enough data
Leigh Chak + Debby Watts5060% gamesnot enough data
Cammie McLeod + Debbie Reyna213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cammie McLeod
56W–54L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Debbie Reyna
130W–61L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
Christy Ulbricht
107W–80L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
4
Diana Royo
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.97
Tanner Watts
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.89
4
Debby Watts
186W–79L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Jennifer Hewitson
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leigh Chak
140W–143L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.