Teams

Young-Woodlands Parks

2026 Adult 40 & Over 2.5 - 4.5 NoHo Men · 4.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-25vs Spearman-Vintage 4.5-WoodlandsLost 03
L#2 DoublesByron Hailey / Bill Zindler vs Paul Chin / Kyle Klinge3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJason Ylizarde / Robert Cantrell vs Michael Mitchell / Kevin Sharp5-7, 4-6
L#4 DoublesChris Micklitz / Michael Letan vs Fernando Bravo / Brent Wassell1-6, 0-6
2026-04-25vs Spearman-Vintage 4.5-WoodlandsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJason Ylizarde / Robert Cantrell vs Albert Piasecki / Ryan Cooper3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesByron Hailey / Bill Zindler vs Kyle Klinge / Kevin Sharp2-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesChris Micklitz / Michael Letan vs Paul Chin / Brent Wassell1-6, 0-6
2026-04-11vs Spearman-Vintage 4.5-WoodlandsLost 05
L#1 DoublesGlenn Wright / Robert Cantrell vs Paul Chin / James Bui4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBill Zindler vs Matias Pugin3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesByron Hailey / Jason Ylizarde vs Hector Villegas / Kevin Sharp2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChris Micklitz / Michael Letan vs Brent Wassell / Brett Sticker1-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesJuan Alvarado / Richard Westgarth vs Michael Mitchell / John Fisher2-6, 1-6
2026-04-11vs Spearman-Vintage 4.5-WoodlandsLost 03
L#1 SinglesBlanton Hansen vs Bjoern Steckel5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesGlenn Wright / Robert Cantrell vs Albert Piasecki / Ryan Cooper3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesByron Hailey / Chris Micklitz vs Hector Villegas / Tyler Cobb3-6, 2-6
2026-04-11vs Spearman-Vintage 4.5-WoodlandsLost 13
L#1 DoublesRobert Cantrell / Glenn Wright vs Michael Mitchell / James Bui5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJason Ylizarde / Byron Hailey vs Brent Wassell / Matias Pugin3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBill Zindler / Juan Alvarado vs Kevin Sharp / Hector Villegas3-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesChris Micklitz / Michael Letan vs Brett Sticker / Paul Chin0-1
2026-04-11vs Spearman-Vintage 4.5-WoodlandsWon 20
W#2 DoublesGlenn Wright / Robert Cantrell vs Ryan Cooper / Albert Piasecki6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesByron Hailey / Chris Micklitz vs Tyler Cobb / Hector Villegas3-1
2026-04-04vs Spearman-Vintage 4.5-WoodlandsLost 05
L#1 DoublesTim Williams / Glenn Wright vs Daniel Duplechin / Hector Villegas5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLuis Cobo vs Alejandro Lara Gugel1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChie Min Chung / Blanton Hansen vs Albert Piasecki / Ryan Cooper1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRob Young / Jason Ylizarde vs Michael Mitchell / Kyle Klinge3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#4 DoublesJason Berilgen / Byron Hailey vs Brent Wassell / Fernando Bravo0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Spearman-Vintage 4.5-Woodlands6128715208
2Young-Woodlands Parks1672857372

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Glenn Wright
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.20
Blanton Hansen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.20
Luis Cobo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.15
Jason Ylizarde
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.08
Byron Hailey
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.06
Robert Cantrell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.02
Chie Min Chung
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
Chris Micklitz
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.86
Bill Zindler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.72
Michael Letan
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.58
Juan Alvarado
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Jason Berilgen
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Tom Caine
published
Woodson Rogers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Cantrell + Glenn Wright134 matchesnot enough data
Michael Letan + Chris Micklitz134 matchesnot enough data
Robert Cantrell + Bill Zindler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Glenn Wright
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Blanton Hansen
31W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
4.20
Luis Cobo
15W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
4.20
Jason Ylizarde
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Byron Hailey
1W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
4.08
Robert Cantrell
5W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.06
4.5
Chie Min Chung
39W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
44%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
Chris Micklitz
38W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.91
4.5
Bill Zindler
84W–95L career · 4 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.86
Michael Letan
23W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.72
Juan Alvarado
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.58
Jason Berilgen
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.58
Tom Caine
0W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Woodson Rogers
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.