Teams

Love ‘em and Leave ‘em 3.0 Weekday

Summer Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY Doubles · 3.0 Ladies

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-21vs Volleys & VibesWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Hawk / Angela Kudrick vs Kendall Bryant Fisk / Laura Mitchell6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAngelique Dale / Heather Ruschitzko vs Alison Dalton / Darby Berra6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStephanie Ohnmacht / Linda Welling vs Erin Geisler / Kelly Schwartz6-0, 6-4
2026-08-14vs Serve-iversWon 20
W#1 DoublesZeina Aboumatar / Lauren Hawk vs Erin Sullivan / Laurie Cannon6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAngelique Dale / Lisa Upah vs Megan DiTeresa / Carole Wilson6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2026-08-07vs Over ServedLost 02
L#1 DoublesAngela Kudrick / Jill Sheppard vs Alison Campbell / Lee Iselt1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngie Hendrie / Jennifer Graham vs Anita Ford / Becky Bell6-7, 4-6
2026-07-31vs Wildcards of WestoverLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Kudrick / Rachel Schnee vs Jennifer Isenberg / Lindsay Ronga6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Graham / Heather Ruschitzko vs Med Luckett / Soraiya Nagree2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAngelique Dale / Celia Vandegraaf vs Elizabeth Cox / Lauren Sawyer6-7, 3-6
2026-07-24vs SlammersLost 12
W#1 DoublesAngela Kudrick / Rachel Schnee vs Linda Schmitt / Michele Starley6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesZeina Aboumatar / Angie Hendrie vs Georgia Nolan / Amber Szczytowski5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Ohnmacht / Karina Rata vs Desiree Foster / Laura Kurth3-6, 3-6
2026-07-17vs Westwood AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmma Ryan / Rachel Schnee vs Jennifer Squires / Sharon Wilson6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAngela Kudrick / Lauren Hawk vs Allison Jackson / Margaret Lauderback6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAngelique Dale / Angie Hendrie vs Laura Northway / Suzanne Greenway2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-07-10vs Summer LoveLost 03
L#1 DoublesLauren Hawk / Angelique Dale vs Shelby Loskorn / Kelly Bremer6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Upah / Jill Sheppard vs Erin Beil / Jesse Bohnert2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKarina Rata / Angie Hendrie vs Carrie Morton / Katie Price7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings18 teams · 3.0 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Love All7015613159
2Wildcards of Westover511539126
3Westwood Aces5111717150
4DropShots5214720177
5Casual Sets4213514148
6Over Served4211715145
7Hot to Go!4210821178
8I'd Hit That4314720177
9Line Catchers4391224184
10Summer Love3311718173
11Volleys & Vibes339920149
12Alleygators34111026202
13Love ‘em and Leave ‘em 3.0 Weekday3481327179
14Slammers2461225180
15Serve Me a Double2581327191
16Top Spin1661533224
17Serve-ivers0741736229
18Forty Love0721939232

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Angela Kudrick
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.94
Emma Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Zeina Aboumatar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Lauren Hawk
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.85
Rachel Schnee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Angelique Dale
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.78
Heather Ruschitzko
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Lisa Upah
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Angie Hendrie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.57
Stephanie Ohnmacht
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Celia Vandegraaf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Linda Welling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Karina Rata
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Sheppard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Kudrick + Rachel Schnee3258% games+10.4% vs expected
Lisa Upah + Emma Ryan3259% games+5.1% vs expected
Lisa Upah + Angela Kudrick6356% games+3.5% vs expected
Emma Ryan + Rachel Schnee13856% games+3.1% vs expected
Angie Hendrie + Zeina Aboumatar5354% games+2.1% vs expected
Angie Hendrie + Rachel Schnee6656% games+1.3% vs expected
Lisa Upah + Angie Hendrie6746% games−7.3% vs expected
Zeina Aboumatar + Lauren Hawk4164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Angela Kudrick
30W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Emma Ryan
34W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Zeina Aboumatar
41W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.88
Lauren Hawk
31W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
2.87
Rachel Schnee
54W–52L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
2.85
3
Angelique Dale
17W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Heather Ruschitzko
12W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
Lisa Upah
37W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Angie Hendrie
52W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.64
Stephanie Ohnmacht
23W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Celia Vandegraaf
4W–10L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55
Linda Welling
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%44%56%
2.52
Karina Rata
6W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Jill Sheppard
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.