Teams

TOC.Robison

2023 CTRL Fall Singles 40 & Over · Fall Singles 40 & Over 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-11-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesYuna Kim vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-11-15Won 10
W#1 SinglesValerie Clowes vs Julianne Surface7-5, 6-0
2023-11-01Won 10
W#3 SinglesYuna Kim vs Amy Mills6-0, 6-0
2023-10-18vs MD.MerchantLost 02
L#2 SinglesYuna Kim vs Sheridan Orr4-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesValerie Clowes vs Katie Ainsley4-6, 4-6
2023-10-11vs TOC.CohenSplit 11
L#1 SinglesValerie Clowes vs Michele Cohen6-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesPaula Laine vs Renata Yakobov1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-10-05Split 11
W#1 SinglesValerie Clowes vs Lissy Wood6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesPaula Laine vs Jackie Scholten3-6, 2-6
2023-09-27Won 20
W#1 SinglesPaula Laine vs Livia Vass6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesYuna Kim vs Alex Kearney6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Singles 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.09
Yuna Kim
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.63
Cara Casuccio
published 2.5
2.52
Laura Robison
published
2.36
Paula Laine
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.31
Debbie Bednarcik
published 2.5
2.29
Kristina Narula
published
2.13
Valerie Clowes
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Laine + Yuna Kim4352% gamesnot enough data
Laura Robison + Debbie Bednarcik213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Yuna Kim
121W–74L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.09
2.5
Cara Casuccio
23W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%17%83%
2.63
Laura Robison
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%43%57%
2.52
2.5
Paula Laine
63W–114L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%85%15%
2.36
2.5
Debbie Bednarcik
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%91%9%
2.31
Kristina Narula
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Valerie Clowes
64W–134L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.