Teams

Williams-CC

2023 CORTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · Men 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.29 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-25vs Steed-GIWon 10
W#3 DoublesChristopher Williams / Bryan Little vs Cameron Kersey / Zachary Fletcher7-5, 6-1
2023-03-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesChristopher Williams / Bryan Little vs Robert Johnson / Robert Persons4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-07vs Steed-GIWon 10
W#2 DoublesBryan Little / Bhimasen Pradhan vs Scott Ammerman / Cameron Kersey6-3, 7-6
2023-02-25vs Garcia-CCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesBryan Little / Josh Chandler vs Forrest Champion / Walter Trawick7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2023-02-18vs Steed-GILost 01
L#1 DoublesBryan Little / Daniel Black vs William Christian / Chris Blanton6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-02-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesBryan Little / Richard Galbraith vs David Mize / Robert Johnson6-3, 6-1
2023-02-04vs Steed-GIWon 10
W#1 DoublesBryan Little / Josh Chandler vs Chris Blanton / John Aguirre6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Christopher Chavez
published 3.5
3.12
Bhimasen Pradhan
published 3.5
3.12
Andy Knight
published 3.5
3.09
Brandon Belisle
published 3.5
2.76
Richard Galbraith
published
Bryan Little
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Daniel Black
published 3
2.73
Brett Daniel
published 3
2.66
Saravanan Veeramani
published
2.58
Jimmy Griffith
published
Love Patel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bhimasen Pradhan + Christopher Chavez213 matchesnot enough data
Bhimasen Pradhan + Brandon Belisle303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christopher Chavez
75W–61L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Bhimasen Pradhan
48W–47L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Andy Knight
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Brandon Belisle
33W–28L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
Richard Galbraith
35W–36L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Bryan Little
23W–23L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Daniel Black
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Brett Daniel
10W–19L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Saravanan Veeramani
21W–17L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
2.66
Jimmy Griffith
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.58
Love Patel
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.