Teams

DC Acers

2022 DC WTA Tri-Level Mixed 18 & Over · DC WTA Tri-Level Mixed 3.5, 3.0, 2.5

15 players · average NTRP 2.94 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-20vs Piney Run MixedLost 01
L#2 DoublesCortney Mukushi / Rudolph Isaac vs Bethlehem Addis / Steven Gibau4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-11-06vs Piney Run MixedLost 01
L#2 DoublesCortney Mukushi / Rudolph Isaac vs Diana Williams Gibau / Steven Gibau4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-10-30vs Piney Run MixedLost 01
L#2 DoublesMitsue Colin / Kudzai Mukushi vs Saxon Henderson / Joel Hardi6-7, 0-4
2022-10-23vs Piney Run MixedLost 01
L#2 DoublesCortney Mukushi / Bill Keating vs Diana Williams Gibau / Sidney Williams2-6, 4-6
2022-10-16Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKristen LaCherra / Raymond Lyons vs Brittani Scott-Smith / Broderick Smith1-6, 4-6
2022-10-02vs Piney Run MixedLost 01
L#2 DoublesCortney Mukushi / Kudzai Mukushi vs Emily Adeleke / Joel Hardi5-7, 2-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for DC WTA Tri-Level Mixed 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
3.12
Rudolph Isaac
published
3.08
Rebecca Sellassie
published
3.08
Charlie JONES
published 3
2.92
Mark Flanegan
published
2.91
Bill Keating
published 3
2.88
Cortney Mukushi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Kudzai Mukushi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Elsie Stines
published 3
2.53
Brian Stanley
published 3
2.44
Rise Lancoon
published
2.41
Raymond Lyons
published
2.26
Franklin Little
published 2.5
2.17
Kristen LaCherra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Stacey Carey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cortney Mukushi + Kudzai Mukushi6845% games+10.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Martin Barnes
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Rudolph Isaac
46W–25L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
Rebecca Sellassie
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Charlie JONES
12W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%27%73%
3.08
Mark Flanegan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Bill Keating
26W–45L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Cortney Mukushi
59W–85L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Kudzai Mukushi
44W–87L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Elsie Stines
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.72
3
Brian Stanley
5W–15L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
2.53
Rise Lancoon
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.44
Raymond Lyons
21W–43L career · no lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
2.41
2.5
Franklin Little
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Kristen LaCherra
23W–52L career · 1 line in 2022
0%99%1%
2.17
Stacey Carey
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.