Teams

WNCC Anders (Aston)

Adult 18 & Over WNC USTA 2025 · 18 & O 4.0 Women Monday evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-21vs WNCS Voyles (ARC S)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesMeredith Silver / Aubrie Donnellan vs Amy Gaston / Kelly McEnany3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesChloe Grund vs Audrey Fortezzo1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Samuelson / Katherine Gutschenritter vs Tina Kinard / Eva Hartman0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMary Cooper vs Rebecca Carchman1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCaroline Anders / Adriane Deeter vs Andi Elliot / Alexis Rosenfelt6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-14vs WNCR Pino (CC of A)Lost 04
L#1 DoublesCaroline Anders / Lisa Samuelson vs Rawson Baylor / Evie Tashie1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMeredith Silver vs Elizabeth Schoen3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAdriane Deeter / Mary Cooper vs Leeann Kelley / Fiona Teague4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Gutschenritter / Aubrie Donnellan vs Janey Cope / Amanda Nichols3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & O 4.0 Women Monday evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Danielle Kwasnik
published 4
3.47
Adriane Deeter
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
3.38
Caroline Anders
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Aubrie Donnellan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
Chloe Grund
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Meredith Silver
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.05
Katherine Gutschenritter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa Samuelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Cooper
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Anders + Adriane Deeter224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Danielle Kwasnik
2W–12L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
3.5
Adriane Deeter
26W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Caroline Anders
25W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Aubrie Donnellan
2W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Chloe Grund
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Meredith Silver
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Katherine Gutschenritter
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Lisa Samuelson
1W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Cooper
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.