← Teams

PTC-McTague/Quinn

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Paul Best
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
David Prescott
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Scott Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Robert Hesslink
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Lars Kasch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Gus Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.64
Mark Darienzo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.60
Michael McTague
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Dave Sasaki
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
James Carey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results9 ties
2021-12-05Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesGus Johnson / Lars Kasch vs Colin Looi / Masafumi Inoue7-6, 6-3
2021-12-04Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesGus Johnson / James Carey vs Scott Mandel / James North6-3, 6-2
2021-11-06Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesScott Quinn / Robert Hesslink vs Kerry Sweet / Dave Gillard6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDavid Prescott / Michael McTague vs Thomas MacDonald / James North6-1, 6-0
2021-10-30Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJames Carey / Gus Johnson vs Scott Dickinson / Jonathan Guinn6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesScott Quinn / David Prescott vs Alex Delarosa / Dave Hardman6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichael McTague / Paul Best vs Steven Grant / Robert Zeigler4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2021-10-23Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesJames Carey / Robert Hesslink vs Ed de la Fuente / Dave Sato6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDave Sasaki / Mark Darienzo vs George Scott / Arkadiy Boyarshinov6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesMichael McTague / Michael Hochstatter vs Norman Langston / Douglas Bennett4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-10-17Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesScott Quinn / David Prescott vs Shootan Pirzadeh / Dan Pope6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDave Sasaki / Mark Darienzo vs Keibun Hayashi / Tom Finnerty7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesPaul Best / Kenneth Carter vs James Prouty / Yongping Liu6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2021-10-09Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesRobert Hesslink / Michael McTague vs Jeff Welter / Dirk Jacobs6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGus Johnson / Lars Kasch vs Fenn Bourland / Hafez Daraee6-3, 6-3
2021-10-03Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesGus Johnson / Robert Hesslink vs Dirk Jacobs / Sam Lumetta6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Best / Lars Kasch vs Monte Gonzales / Andrew Craig7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKenneth Carter / Mark Darienzo vs Masafumi Inoue / Colin Looi6-0, 6-0
2021-09-26Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJames Carey / Gus Johnson vs Dave Gillard / Thomas MacDonald6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesScott Quinn / David Prescott vs James North / Scott Mandel6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLars Kasch / Dave Sasaki vs John Slominski / Stan Earnshaw6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Paul Best
46W–76L career
0%97%3%
2.86
3
David Prescott
44W–47L career
1%91%8%
2.85
3
Scott Quinn
74W–62L career
0%99%1%
2.81
3
Robert Hesslink
70W–52L career
0%98%2%
2.81
3
Lars Kasch
32W–61L career
2%96%2%
2.77
3
Gus Johnson
37W–29L career
not enough data
—
3
Mark Darienzo
16W–25L career
16%83%1%
2.64
3
Michael McTague
50W–87L career
18%82%0%
2.60
3
Dave Sasaki
21W–42L career
15%85%0%
2.60
3
James Carey
54W–35L career
17%83%0%
2.59

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.