Teams

CV-Four Seasons Beaumont/Beckman

2025 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - CV · CV Men 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesSteve Clark / Alex Castanon vs Barry Hackshaw / Sorin Alexanian4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Rojko / Hector Calderon vs George Balch / Frank Gagnon3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLarry Martin / Steven Hovey vs Steve Breit / Jim Bauersfeld1-6, 2-6
2025-02-27vs CV-Sun City PD/Bim PrinceWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlex Castanon / Steve Clark vs Bryan Olson / Roger Bim Prince6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKelly Curtis / Stan Lam vs Neb Radojkovich / Gregg Funfar6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLarry Martin / Steven Hovey vs Larry Thau / Ricardo Molato6-7, 2-6
W#1 DoublesCharles Beckman / Larry Martin vs George Balch / Steve Breit6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlex Castanon / Hector Calderon vs Jim Bauersfeld / Rick Krueger6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRandy Haemmerle / William Hendra vs Jeffrey Thompson / Sorin Alexanian3-6, 0-6
2025-02-06vs CV-Sun City PD/Bim PrinceLost 12
L#1 DoublesCharles Beckman / Kelly Curtis vs Bryan Olson / Randolph Rogers3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMichael Olson / Steve Clark vs Roger Bim Prince / Neb Radojkovich2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesHector Calderon / Stan Lam vs Fernando Gomez / Gregg Funfar6-4, 6-4
2025-01-30vs CV-Deep Canyon/Blanton & MaxwellLost 03
L#1 DoublesLarry Martin / Steve Clark vs Arthur Poirier / John Humphreys6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Curtis / Michael Olson vs Brian Yellin / Paul Blanton2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHector Calderon / Richard Rojko vs Douglas Goldade / Jim Bartell4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesCharles Beckman / Larry Martin vs Frank Gagnon / Rick Krueger2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Flowers / Hector Calderon vs William Eir / Barry Hackshaw1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Olson / Randy Haemmerle vs Brad Smith / Sorin Alexanian0-6, 3-6
2025-01-16vs CV-Sun City PD/Bim PrinceLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlex Castanon / Steve Clark vs Bryan Olson / Randolph Rogers6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRandy Haemmerle / Michael Olson vs Roger Bim Prince / Neb Radojkovich2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHector Calderon / Brian Flowers vs Gregg Funfar / Randy Grotem2-6, 4-6
2025-01-09vs CV-Deep Canyon/Blanton & MaxwellLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlex Castanon / Michael Olson vs John Tilford / Brian Yellin4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLarry Martin / Randy Haemmerle vs John Humphreys / Arthur Poirier2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesStan Lam / Hector Calderon vs Jim Bartell / Douglas Goldade4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Charles Beckman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Alex Castanon
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.75
Brian Flowers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Hector Calderon
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Kelly Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Larry Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Randy Haemmerle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Rojko
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Stan Lam
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Clark
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Steven Hovey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
William Hendra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Larry Martin + Charles Beckman4545% gamesnot enough data
Alex Castanon + Steve Clark2346% gamesnot enough data
Stan Lam + Hector Calderon224 matchesnot enough data
Larry Martin + Steven Hovey033 matchesnot enough data
Brian Flowers + Hector Calderon033 matchesnot enough data
Brian Flowers + Randy Haemmerle033 matchesnot enough data
Alex Castanon + Hector Calderon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charles Beckman
8W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Alex Castanon
6W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Brian Flowers
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Hector Calderon
7W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Curtis
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Larry Martin
8W–14L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Randy Haemmerle
4W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Rojko
4W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stan Lam
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Clark
3W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Hovey
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
William Hendra
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.