Teams

GPTC GREEN

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.89 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-27vs GTC SILVERWon 21
W#1 DoublesHilaria Davis / Molly Shinners vs Taylor DeLay / Jill Kroeker6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnna Gallagher / Lani Reichardt vs Carlie Jacobsen / Janessa Jacobsen7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Barnhill / Niyati Thakkar vs Sarajane Goodfellow / Brianna Laffey3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-20vs DTC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesHilaria Davis / Anna Gallagher vs Kara Bonanno / Sharol Preisser6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDevin Fields / Gabrielle Mattioda vs Lisa OConnor / Laura James0-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesLisa Barnhill / Niyati Thakkar vs Janice Jensen / Jennifer Sutton6-3, 6-3
2025-05-15vs SKY BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesKatherine Barston / Cristina Cook vs Kim Riley / Mimi Pomeranz6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHilaria Davis / Anna Gallagher vs Jane Gonnella / Jennifer Urbonas6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-05-13vs CACM REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesKatherine Barston / Cristina Cook vs Stacey Branch / Smita Merchant6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesGabrielle Mattioda vs Lina Reznicek-Parrado3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHilaria Davis / Anna Gallagher vs Jena Dupont / Jessica Pohl7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2025-04-29vs CM GOLDLost 12
L#1 DoublesLani Reichardt / Niyati Thakkar vs Lindsay Filsinger / Lauren Harrington5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesHilaria Davis / Molly Shinners vs Mindy Franks / Amy Newman3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKatherine Barston / Anna Gallagher vs Kathleen Heerdt / Krista Speicher6-0, 6-4
2025-04-22vs CP NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesHilaria Davis / Molly Shinners vs Gabrielle Helfgott / Claire Collins6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatherine Barston / Anna Gallagher vs Amy Meadows / Denise Fisher6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCristina Cook / Lani Reichardt vs Emily Pruisner / Monique Wehrle7-6, 7-6
2025-04-15vs CACM GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHilaria Davis / Anna Gallagher vs Andrea Gordon / Linda Manhkhong4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCristina Cook / Lisa Barnhill vs Stephanie Mcgowan / Angie Sanders6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMolly Shinners vs Elizabeth Kirkpatrick5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLani Reichardt / Gabrielle Mattioda vs Rachel Nutt / Sara Vanek4-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings22 teams · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTC-D RED7026927299
2WP-G ORANGE6026411166
3LTA-P GREEN6126924262
4HRCA-N BLUE61251027257
5CK RED61221329300
6EM GOLD51201026240
7BTA-C NAVY52231232289
8RRTC GREEN52201537320
9CP BRONZE52181739322
10TTA BLACK43191636314
11GPTC GREEN43181737311
12BTA-IBM RED34152045333
13FOX SILVER34152049344
14WP-G BLUE34142149371
15PH GOLD25181737329
16VCC BLUE25161944341
17DCHS GOLD25152046323
18BRMST BLACK25112452358
19DCHS BLUE16132246351
20WC GOLD16102551366
21HV BLACK16102552364
22ATC NAVY0652552340

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Katherine Barston
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.94
Molly Shinners
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.94
Hilaria Davis
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.90
Kaye Johnson
published
3.83
Anna Gallagher
published 4
Daria Emelianova
published 4
Devin Fields
published 4
3.67
Gabrielle Mattioda
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.27
Lani Reichardt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Lisa Barnhill
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Niyati Thakkar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hilaria Davis + Molly Shinners22662% games+1.8% vs expected
Lani Reichardt + Molly Shinners2345% games−2.1% vs expected
Hilaria Davis + Lani Reichardt134 matchesnot enough data
Lani Reichardt + Katherine Barston314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katherine Barston
48W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
4.16
4
Molly Shinners
51W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.94
4
Hilaria Davis
136W–74L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
Kaye Johnson
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Anna Gallagher
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Daria Emelianova
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Devin Fields
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Gabrielle Mattioda
66W–58L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
3.5
Lani Reichardt
98W–122L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Lisa Barnhill
71W–144L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Niyati Thakkar
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.