Teams

EFSC - Zavaleta

2024 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-24vs Brevard/Flores/Combo18&Over8.5MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKleber Fukamizu / Andy McConnell vs Bruno Pintchovski Rodrigues / Daniel Evans6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesToney McIntosh / Gregory Whitaker vs Daniel Flores / Stephen Westmoreland2-6, 1-6
2024-10-17vs Suntree - CarverSplit 11
L#2 DoublesEric Mulhern / Douglas Nelson vs Keith Alvares / Michael Phelipa4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGregory Whitaker / Toney McIntosh vs Kyle McIntosh / Robert Baerst6-0, 6-3
2024-10-16vs Brevard/Flores/Combo18&Over8.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesKleber Fukamizu / Andy McConnell vs Daniel Flores / Stephen Westmoreland5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-09-12vs Fee - MinnisWon 30
W#1 DoublesKleber Fukamizu / Elliott Hogans vs Christopher Meenen / Eric Eichholz6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesThomas Eskridge / Nico San Nicolas vs Prakriti Das / Mitchel Dubolsky6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesIsidro Zavaleta / Toney McIntosh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-08-29vs Brevard/Flores/Combo18&Over8.5MWon 10
W#1 DoublesKleber Fukamizu / Andy McConnell vs Angel Alayon / Stephen Westmoreland1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-08-24vs Fee - MinnisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesThomas Eskridge / Elliott Hogans vs Brad Minnis / Mitchel Dubolsky4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKleber Fukamizu / Nico San Nicolas vs Prakriti Das / Christopher Meenen6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Kleber Fukamizu
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.21
Eric Mulhern
published
4.01
Jason Abbott
published
3.89
Douglas Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Nico San Nicolas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Andy McConnell
published 4
3.80
Kevin Villa
published
3.71
Elliott Hogans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Isidro Zavaleta
published
Thomas Eskridge
published
Toney McIntosh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nico San Nicolas + Elliott Hogans2344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kleber Fukamizu
20W–15L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
4.32
Eric Mulhern
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
Jason Abbott
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
4.01
Douglas Nelson
36W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.89
Nico San Nicolas
42W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Andy McConnell
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Kevin Villa
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Elliott Hogans
139W–73L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Isidro Zavaleta
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
Thomas Eskridge
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Toney McIntosh
66W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.