Teams

OC LNRC - Dennis - Sat1030

2025 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Men - 3.5

21 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-06vs OC Marbella CC - Doug Sat1Won 21
W#1 DoublesPeter Barbaresi / Doug Frazier vs Jack Rollins / Michael Finley6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn Homans / J Mark Deric vs Doug Mazell / Evan Guerrero2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBrian Jacobs / Lee Novick vs David Powell / Erik Hallenbeck7-5, 7-6
2025-11-22vs OC YLCC - Alan - Sun1Won 21
W#1 DoublesJack Xu / John Homans vs Neb Petrovacki / Zachary Gerard6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAn Le / Doug Frazier vs Allen Whitten / Franco Pelleralla7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrian Jacobs / Sean Leonard vs Joseph Leonardi / Martin Langpap2-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesSean Leonard / Michael Beresford vs Troy Yunfeng Li / Colin Gui0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSanti Pierini / Doug Frazier vs CHUN YIN / Wilson Zhu5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLee Novick / Cole Pinder vs Li Xu / Steve Su4-6, 4-6
2025-10-12vs OC Yorba Linda - RyanLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlex Bellini / Travis Pedersen vs Diego Teran / Richard Frank5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Yoder / Lee Novick vs Morgan Reed / Paul Finchamp2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesCole Pinder / An Le vs Ryan Freimann / Greggory Applefield6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-10-05vs OC CMTC - Q - Sat9Won 21
W#1 DoublesAlex Bellini / Travis Pedersen vs Kyle Le / Thomas Medina2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesIshaan Mody / John Homans vs BRYAN NGUYEN / Q Viet Tran6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSanti Pierini / Brian Twigger vs Martin Staszak / Ted Shang2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
John Homans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Peter Barbaresi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Ishaan Mody
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Travis Pedersen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Cole Pinder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Alex Bellini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
David Nachreiner
published 3.5
3.19
Doug Frazier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Stephen Lozano
published
3.11
Michael Yoder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Lee Novick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Dennis Jones
published 3
3.05
Santi Pierini
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
David Berk
published 3.5
3.00
Brian Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
J Mark Deric
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Brian Twigger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jack Xu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Beresford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sean Leonard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Todd MacCallum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Homans + Peter Barbaresi6264% games+8.6% vs expected
John Homans + Michael Yoder314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Homans
14W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.54
Peter Barbaresi
11W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Ishaan Mody
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.46
Travis Pedersen
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Cole Pinder
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Alex Bellini
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
David Nachreiner
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Doug Frazier
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Stephen Lozano
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Michael Yoder
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Lee Novick
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Dennis Jones
2W–15L career · type A · no lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.07
Santi Pierini
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
David Berk
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
3.5
Brian Jacobs
1W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
J Mark Deric
2W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Brian Twigger
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jack Xu
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Beresford
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sean Leonard
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd MacCallum
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.