Teams

2 MTC Winner

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-29vs 14 WOCC 3.5 Singles - MullinaxWon 30
W#1 SinglesAaron Lawhorne vs Mark Simonton6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRob Williams vs Shawn Harwood7-5, 6-4
W#3 SinglesBlake Winner vs Ivan Mullinax6-3, 6-3
2025-10-22vs 13 Avalon Singlets - BeldingLost 12
L#1 SinglesMichael Cousineau vs Todd Milligan6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAaron Lawhorne vs Richard Stowers6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesMichael May vs Kristopher Johnson0-6, 1-6
2025-10-13vs 11 Kanawha BarrangerWon 21
W#1 SinglesGreg Dean vs Sam Cohen7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAaron Lawhorne vs John Ward6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesBlake Winner vs Creighton Anders2-6, 4-6
2025-10-10vs 7 ACAC ChandlerLost 12
L#1 SinglesBlake Winner vs Alexander Smith4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesGreg Dean vs John Kosco6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesMichael May vs Ken Hatcher1-6, 1-6
2025-10-06vs 9 Raintree PrestiaWon 21
W#1 SinglesGreg Dean vs Victor Tubungbanua7-6, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMichael Cousineau vs Don Ha6-0, 6-3
L#3 SinglesMichael May vs David Blankley7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2025-09-22vs 4 Lakeside Kings 3.5Won 21
W#1 SinglesGreg Dean vs Ryan Gibson6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesRob Williams vs Carlos Empeno5-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMichael Cousineau vs Brian Cox6-2, 6-3
2025-09-15vs 1 MTC JacobsenLost 03
L#1 SinglesGreg Dean vs Christopher Geoghegan2-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesAaron Lawhorne vs Gianni R Snidle1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 SinglesPaul Bannister vs Alexander Feldman2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Aaron Lawhorne
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.60
Greg Dean
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.39
Michael Cousineau
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.37
Paul Bannister
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.21
Blake Winner
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.53
Michael May
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Rob Williams
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Cousineau + Aaron Lawhorne404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aaron Lawhorne
27W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.66
4
Greg Dean
20W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Michael Cousineau
13W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Paul Bannister
14W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Blake Winner
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
Michael May
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.53
Rob Williams
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.