Teams

BBTL55/Chaney-Malinowski/TLC

Mixed 55 & Over · Mixed 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-06-08vs BBTL55/Hutchings/TLCWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Malinowski / Terri Chaney vs Howard Freilich / Anna Levonyak6-4, 7-5
2026-05-11vs BBTL55/Hutchings/TLCWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Ficarella / Robert Malinowski vs Bruce Duff / Jane Ravey3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-05-04vs BBTL55/Hutchings/TLCWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerri Chaney / Robert Malinowski vs Samantha Boyd / Russ Roberts6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Mixed 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BBTL55/Chaney-Malinowski/TLC5315924193
2BBTL55/Hutchings/TLC3591534248

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Albert Day
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.87
Royston Tedder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.86
Nancy Ficarella
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.81
James Diaz
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Robert Malinowski
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Deanna Childers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Amy Willow Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.60
Terri Chaney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Brian Tolley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Scott Vogel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Willow Cooper + Albert Day8264% games+7.1% vs expected
Robert Malinowski + Nancy Ficarella4153% games+1.8% vs expected
Robert Malinowski + Terri Chaney303 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Ficarella + Albert Day303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Albert Day
91W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
Royston Tedder
43W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
Nancy Ficarella
136W–84L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.86
James Diaz
55W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Robert Malinowski
48W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
4
Deanna Childers
57W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Amy Willow Cooper
100W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Terri Chaney
35W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Brian Tolley
57W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Scott Vogel
13W–11L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.