Teams

300 Club - Smith

2023 Alachua Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.44 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-29vs ALACHUA/Madorsky/Mixed55&Over7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBetsy Severance / Robert Reed vs Lynn Godwin / Rubin Crespo1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMarisa McLeod / Troy Hart vs Mickie Anderson / Paul Folkers6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLaurie McLaughlin / Jack Jacobs vs Genne' DeHenau McDonald / Paul Lipori3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-05-28vs JTC - GilsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Halinski / Richard Wright vs Shirley Clark / Ed Stark2-6, 1-6
2023-05-21vs ALACHUA/Madorsky/Mixed55&Over7.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Halinski / Richard Wright vs Lynn Godwin / Paul Folkers1-6, 2-6
2023-04-28vs ALACHUA/Madorsky/Mixed55&Over7.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesMarisa McLeod / Jim Severance vs Irina Madorsky / Kevin Smith4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie McLaughlin / Jack Jacobs vs Mickie Anderson / Hank Dudding6-3, 6-2
2023-04-16vs JTC - GilsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaurie McLaughlin / John Flowers vs Ed Stark / Michelle Ivanowski2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Johnson / Lawrence Hooghuis vs Christa Arnold / Jian Pu4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Jim Severance
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Christine Borden
published 3.5
3.17
Jennifer Halinski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Jack Jacobs
published 3.5
3.14
Laurie McLaughlin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Cindy McManus
published 3.5
3.11
Lawrence Hooghuis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Lindy Archambeau
published
3.01
John Flowers
published
2.77
Betsy Severance
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Marisa McLeod
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Wright
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Betsy Severance + Jim Severance41340% games+0.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jim Severance
29W–50L career · 1 line in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Christine Borden
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Jennifer Halinski
61W–70L career · 2 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Jack Jacobs
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Laurie McLaughlin
78W–154L career · 3 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Cindy McManus
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Lawrence Hooghuis
53W–135L career · 1 line in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
Lindy Archambeau
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.09
John Flowers
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Betsy Severance
13W–59L career · 1 line in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
Marisa McLeod
81W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Wright
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.