Teams

LA - LATC

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over – LA · LA - Men 3.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for LA - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Jack Angelo
published
3.43
David Padua
published 3.5
3.38
Johnny Kostrey
published
3.35
Michael Goltermann
published
3.31
Jesse Dang
published
3.27
Kevin Hann
published
3.24
Charlie Hutchinson
published 3.5
3.24
Jesse Young
published
3.23
Aristotle Pearce
published 3.5
3.22
AJ Dickerson
published 3.5
3.17
George Phillips
published
3.16
Fred Jasper
published
3.12
Tom Rubinson
published
3.10
Jim Hliboki
published
3.08
Jeffrey Soros
published
3.07
James Tupper
published
3.05
Rick Marin
published
3.03
Sean Furst
published
3.02
Mark Roybal
published
2.74
Ronnie Roy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
John Bauman
published
Michael Morrison
published
Satish Subramanian
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Tupper + Jesse Dang0537% gamesnot enough data
Michael Morrison + Jesse Young123 matchesnot enough data
Jesse Dang + Jesse Young213 matchesnot enough data
AJ Dickerson + Ronnie Roy033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jack Angelo
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
3.5
David Padua
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Johnny Kostrey
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.38
Michael Goltermann
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Jesse Dang
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Kevin Hann
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Charlie Hutchinson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Jesse Young
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Aristotle Pearce
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
AJ Dickerson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
George Phillips
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Fred Jasper
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Tom Rubinson
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Jim Hliboki
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Jeffrey Soros
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
James Tupper
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Rick Marin
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Sean Furst
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Mark Roybal
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.02
Ronnie Roy
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
John Bauman
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Morrison
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Satish Subramanian
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.