Teams

Duval/Stone/18&Over3.5W

2024 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.64 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-06-29vs Eagle Harbor - CloutierWon 10
W#2 DoublesOlivia Markham / Vandi Cole vs Kimberly Schoof / Jolene Hamel6-4, 6-3
2024-06-09vs Eagle Landing - BrinkWon 10
W#3 DoublesManisha Valentin / Vandi Cole vs Amarillys Rodriguez / Jody Vance Cabrera7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-19vs Williams Y - TiefenthalerWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarol Kelley / Vandi Cole vs Carman Kasper / Christina Rigby6-1, 6-3
2024-05-05vs Southside - BrooksWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarol Kelley / Vandi Cole vs Susan Sceifers / Amille Jackson7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Amanda Boyle
published 4
3.71
Ali Hall
published 4
3.64
Katie Milligan
published
3.40
Manisha Valentin
published
3.40
Aura Bernal
published 3.5
3.38
Vandi Cole
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.38
Carol Kelley
published 3.5
3.38
Diane Stone
published 3.5
3.34
Olivia Markham
published
3.31
Carey Johnson
published 3.5
3.24
Patricia Kozack
published
3.19
Tammy Oswald
published
3.12
Elizabeth Messina
published
3.07
Cherie Johnson
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammy Oswald + Vandi Cole7548% games−1.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Messina + Diane Stone1436% gamesnot enough data
Aura Bernal + Diane Stone4158% gamesnot enough data
Carey Johnson + Patricia Kozack123 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Messina + Manisha Valentin123 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Kozack + Katie Milligan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amanda Boyle
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Ali Hall
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Katie Milligan
26W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.64
Manisha Valentin
21W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Aura Bernal
23W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Vandi Cole
78W–46L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Carol Kelley
24W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Diane Stone
24W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Olivia Markham
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Carey Johnson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Patricia Kozack
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.24
Tammy Oswald
18W–19L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
Elizabeth Messina
9W–24L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Cherie Johnson
8W–17L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.