Teams

TTraub (WSRC)

2026 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Combo 7.5 Men - Tues PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-01vs DBrantmeyer (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin Seasely / Gary Usher vs Brian Cudney / Jonathan Hurd0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJerry Holman / Michael Twer vs Hector Tovar / Mauricio Jurin1-6, 0-6
2026-08-25vs JNichols (Carmel)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesGary Usher / Larry McCorkle vs Mike Ryan / Scott Starling2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJeff Allcock / Jerry Holman vs Roger Bredder / Tom Parker6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Twer / Kevin Seasely vs Michael Dougherty / Dean Lackey2-6, 1-6
2026-08-18vs JFulcomer (Southampton)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRichard Teat / Steven Todd vs Joseph Gann / MARK TERRIO6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Seasely / Jeff Allcock vs Bo Chriscoe / Aaron Backus4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJerry Holman / Chin Lin vs Scott Davis / David Shuman6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 55 & Over Combo 7.5 Men - Tues PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DBrantmeyer (Queens)1030120
2JFulcomer (Southampton)1021223
3JBlocksom (WSRC)1021326
4KFox/JRobinson (Blakeney)1021326
5RLinder/Polacek (Life Time)000000
6RPietrykowski (PPRSC)0112432
7TTraub (WSRC)0112430
8JWolf (WSRC)0112426
9JNichols (Carmel)0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Tom Traub
published
3.82
Richard Teat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Kevin Seasely
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Jerry Holman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.59
Larry McCorkle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.52
Chin Lin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.51
Jim Waud
published 4
3.43
Steven Todd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Jeff Allcock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Gary Usher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chin Lin + Jeff Allcock5164% games+14.7% vs expected
Richard Teat + Larry McCorkle224 matchesnot enough data
Richard Teat + Steven Todd314 matchesnot enough data
Gary Usher + Chin Lin224 matchesnot enough data
Tom Traub + Kevin Seasely213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tom Traub
14W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Richard Teat
91W–66L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Kevin Seasely
48W–87L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.64
Jerry Holman
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.63
Larry McCorkle
11W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Chin Lin
83W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.52
4
Jim Waud
33W–47L career · no lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
Steven Todd
21W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Jeff Allcock
26W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Gary Usher
27W–77L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.