Teams

BayPointe-Brown

2024 OWB Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Redick / Van Hughes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-16vs Florida/Zaborski/40&Over8.0XDLost 02
L#2 DoublesVan Hughes / Michael Johns vs Lubomir Kaderjak / Akiko Ichimasa3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTina Phillips / Travis Sykes vs Katie Robinson / Hari Prasad1-6, 5-7
2024-03-16Split 11
L#1 DoublesTina Phillips / Travis Sykes vs Akiko Ichimasa / Lubomir Kaderjak3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesMichael Johns / Van Hughes vs Ingo Riemer / Ashley Goyne4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesNatacha Phillips / Derek Cotton vs Ashley Goyne / Ingo Riemer6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-03-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Johns / Van Hughes vs Akiko Ichimasa / Lubomir Kaderjak2-6, 3-6
2024-03-03Lost 01
L#3 DoublesNatacha Phillips / Derek Cotton vs Charlotte Dunworth / Keith Williams4-6, 2-6
2024-03-03vs Shalimar Pointe-DunworthWon 20
W#1 DoublesNatacha Phillips / Derek Cotton vs Dianna Dylewski / Mark Violette3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTina Phillips / Travis Sykes vs Charlotte Dunworth / Gregory Bennett6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Alexis Ernst
published 4.5
3.91
Brad Brown
published 4
3.87
Derek Cotton
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Travis Sykes
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Natacha Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Tina Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Van Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Joseph Cason
published
Marsha Waller
published
Michael Johns
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Derek Cotton + Natacha Phillips7162% gamesnot enough data
Travis Sykes + Natacha Phillips3357% gamesnot enough data
Travis Sykes + Tina Phillips123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alexis Ernst
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
4.32
4
Brad Brown
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Derek Cotton
29W–15L career · type S · 3 lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Travis Sykes
80W–55L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Natacha Phillips
134W–77L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Tina Phillips
69W–42L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Van Hughes
84W–84L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.36
Joseph Cason
14W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
Marsha Waller
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Johns
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.