Teams

RAFAEL RC CW7.5A

2025 COMBO · Women 7.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-02vs MT TAM RC CW7.5AWon 21
L#1 DoublesEileen Benson / Kendal Burrell vs Colleen Bertiglia / Katherine Matso0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Hoffman / Sharon Klein vs Sara Crate / Hikari Tamura5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Fonkalsrud / Betsy Snyder vs Ilana Roth / Jennifer Schwartz4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-27vs MT TAM RC CW7.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Anderson / Margarita Wear vs Elein Phipps / Sheri Yu6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKendal Burrell / Michelle Nardone vs Urmila Bajpai-Pillai / Giulia Sergi2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAshley Hellyer / Cheryl Clark vs Kristin Klein / Nina Trowbridge3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Kelly Mcgeehan
published
3.70
Hayley Burner
published
3.66
Lauren Volpi
published
3.55
Eileen Benson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Margarita Wear
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Sharon Klein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Petra Jacobson
published
3.34
Eliza Denitto
published
3.26
Betsy Snyder
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Ashley Hellyer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Cheryl Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Sarah Fonkalsrud
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Susan Ginwala
published
3.18
Joanna Brook
published
3.17
Nhat Johnston
published
3.15
Kendal Burrell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Amy Atherton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Jamie Bartell
published
3.06
Michelle Nardone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jen Traeger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Klein + Lauren Volpi4455% games+8.4% vs expected
Ashley Hellyer + Joanna Brook4838% games−0.8% vs expected
Sharon Klein + Margarita Wear2739% games−2.5% vs expected
Betsy Snyder + Sarah Fonkalsrud3343% games−12.4% vs expected
Margarita Wear + Lauren Volpi3252% gamesnot enough data
Kendal Burrell + Eliza Denitto224 matchesnot enough data
Kendal Burrell + Michelle Nardone224 matchesnot enough data
Betsy Snyder + Susan Ginwala123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Mcgeehan
17W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.91
Hayley Burner
13W–36L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Lauren Volpi
22W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.66
Eileen Benson
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.55
Margarita Wear
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Sharon Klein
17W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.47
Petra Jacobson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Eliza Denitto
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Betsy Snyder
6W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Ashley Hellyer
20W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Cheryl Clark
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Sarah Fonkalsrud
10W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Susan Ginwala
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
Joanna Brook
14W–23L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Nhat Johnston
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Kendal Burrell
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Amy Atherton
8W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Jamie Bartell
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Michelle Nardone
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Jen Traeger
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.