Teams

LT

2021 TRIO - NOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO - NOCO

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-04-17vs FCCC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeborah Lockwood / Bernita Sterling vs Terese Shanley / Shannon Holt6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesShannon Bigner vs Denise Benz6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJanice Sale / Sara Hoff vs Crystal Osthoff / Amy Artzer6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2021-04-10vs FCCC ORANGELost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Rogers / Mary Gabiola vs Shanti Green / Jane Schmelzle3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesShannon Bigner vs Diane Erickson3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSara Hoff / Bernita Sterling vs Laurie Hittesdorf / Sherry McCoy1-6, 2-6
2021-04-03vs TAGWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeborah Lockwood / Mary Gabiola vs Melissa Dalton / Dawn Setser6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesShannon Bigner vs Shelly Donahue6-3, 6-1
2021-03-28vs MLF BURGUNDYLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeborah Lockwood / Mary Gabiola vs Ginger Butcher / Jacalyn Petersen1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesShannon Bigner vs Layne Martin2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBernita Sterling / Janice Sale vs Wendy Sprague / Audrie Diel6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2021-03-27vs MLF SILVERLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Gabiola / Bernita Sterling vs Liz Cundall / Satie Walker4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMary Rogers / Janice Sale vs Lisa Martin / Kimberley Pascavis1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TRIO - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Janice Sale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Deborah Lockwood
published 3
Shannon Bigner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.69
Mary Gabiola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Bernita Sterling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Sara Hoff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Sale + Bernita Sterling101450% games−3.6% vs expected
Janice Sale + Deborah Lockwood3352% gamesnot enough data
Sara Hoff + Deborah Lockwood303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Janice Sale
95W–103L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Deborah Lockwood
35W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Shannon Bigner
41W–62L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Mary Gabiola
61W–86L career · 4 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Bernita Sterling
71W–106L career · 4 lines in 2021
32%67%<1%
2.56
Sara Hoff
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.