Teams

Yadkin/Nobel/18 2.5

2025 Yadkin Valley Singles 18 & Over · Women 2.5 - Tuesday Night

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-19vs Yadkin/Alejandra/18 2.5 SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesEmily Mccord vs Grace Anderson2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJoann Binkley vs Maria Acuin1-6, 1-6
2025-08-05vs Yadkin/Dellis/18 2.5Lost 03
L#1 SinglesAlexa Florencio vs Amanda Crews1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLeana Brown vs Justine Maher3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesValerie Faison vs Katherine McPherson4-6
2025-07-29vs Yadkin/Alejandra/18 2.5 SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesJanice Tsoules vs Maria Alejandra Forero Martinez7-5, 7-5
W#2 SinglesSarah Barr vs Rebecca Smitherman6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAlexa Florencio vs Maria Acuin2-6, 3-6
2025-07-15vs Yadkin/Dellis/18 2.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesValerie Faison vs Jillaine Dellis0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSarah Barr vs Amanda Crews3-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesJanice Tsoules vs Patricia Townsend6-0, 6-0
2025-06-28vs Yadkin/Dellis/18 2.5Lost 12
L#1 SinglesValerie Faison vs Justine Maher0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJoann Binkley vs Katherine McPherson0-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesLeah Nobel vs Patricia Townsend6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-06-17vs Yadkin/Alejandra/18 2.5 SinglesWon 10
W#2 SinglesSarah Barr vs Maria Acuin6-8, 0-2
2025-06-03vs Yadkin/Dellis/18 2.5Lost 03
L#1 SinglesLeana Brown vs Jillaine Dellis0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJoann Binkley vs Patricia Townsend1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesEmily Mccord vs Justine Maher2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 - Tuesday Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.50
Alexa Florencio
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.43
Emily Mccord
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.40
Janice Tsoules
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.36
Valerie Faison
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.35
Leana Brown
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
1.74
Joann Binkley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Leah Nobel
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Sarah Barr
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Barr + Leah Nobel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Alexa Florencio
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
Emily Mccord
22W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%68%32%
2.43
Janice Tsoules
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
Valerie Faison
16W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
Leana Brown
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
Joann Binkley
0W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.74
Leah Nobel
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Barr
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.