Teams

TennisAddicts (Tamiami Park)

2025 MIAMIDADE Adult 40 & Over - ESL Fall Day · 4.0 Adult Men

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alain Gutierrez
published 4.5
4.24
Juan Alfonso
published
4.02
Jorge Rassi
published
3.99
Sergio Barth
usually #4 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.86
Michael Palacios
published
3.85
Roberto Nieves
published
3.85
Fernando Vasquez
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.79
Francisco Romano
published
3.79
Fernando Blasi
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Oscar Garcia
published
3.77
Yangel Correa
published
3.77
Gerardo Raven
published
3.76
Humberto Cuffaro
published
3.74
Hugo Barraez
published
3.70
Bryant Carreno
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Juan Caruso
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Enoc Martinez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hugo Barraez + Juan Caruso3248% games+8.4% vs expected
Fernando Vasquez + Sergio Barth5163% games+7.8% vs expected
Fernando Vasquez + Gerardo Raven5067% games+7.7% vs expected
Bryant Carreno + Sergio Barth4162% games+5.3% vs expected
Jorge Rassi + Sergio Barth8156% games+1.4% vs expected
Roberto Nieves + Francisco Romano3254% games−2.4% vs expected
Bryant Carreno + Francisco Romano4351% games−8.2% vs expected
Fernando Blasi + Juan Caruso3354% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alain Gutierrez
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Juan Alfonso
20W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
4.24
Jorge Rassi
14W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Sergio Barth
110W–34L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.99
Michael Palacios
21W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
Roberto Nieves
25W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Fernando Vasquez
44W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.85
Francisco Romano
30W–21L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Fernando Blasi
134W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Oscar Garcia
19W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
Yangel Correa
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Gerardo Raven
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
Humberto Cuffaro
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Hugo Barraez
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Bryant Carreno
123W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
3.5
Juan Caruso
110W–65L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
Enoc Martinez
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.