Teams

Sterling (Granada Tennis)

2022 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Spring Day · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.06 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-01vs Banciella (Continental Park)Split 11
L#1 SinglesChie-Mie Chyung vs Alejandra Hanson1-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesMeriden Gelb / Rosemarie Sterling vs Ilona Anderson / Beatriz Ochoa6-4, 6-2
2022-03-18vs Fernandez (Salvadore Park)Lost 01
L#4 DoublesAnaElena Multach / Meriden Gelb vs Kathy Swank / Ana Rubin0-6, 4-6
2022-03-11Lost 01
L#1 SinglesChie-Mie Chyung vs Lauren Bronfman6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2022-03-04vs Gill (Miami Beach Tennis Center)Lost 01
L#4 DoublesChie-Mie Chyung / Pamela Garrison vs Melinda Berman / Hilda Coronel1-6, 5-7
2022-02-18vs Mamujee (Shula's)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPatricia Nathan / Chie-Mie Chyung vs Sima Sadoughi / Yulia Childs1-6, 0-6
2022-01-28vs Terrazas (Morgan Levy Park)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDoris Ruiz / Patricia Nathan vs Yersika Fernandez Labrador / Pilar Gomez5-7, 0-6
L#4 DoublesChie-Mie Chyung / Maria Angelica Sintes vs Esther Texier / Mildred Houdayer3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Carolina Backes
published 3.5
2.83
Patricia Nathan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Meriden Gelb
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Holly Lopez
published 3
2.65
Rosemarie Sterling
published
2.60
Cheryl Levin
published 3
2.60
IRMA CAMARENA
published 3
2.58
2.54
AnaElena Multach
published 3
2.47
Chie-Mie Chyung
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.41
Pamela Hartmann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Angelica Sintes + Gloria Suarez-Sanchez2348% games−1.8% vs expected
Pamela Hartmann + IRMA CAMARENA1438% games−4.5% vs expected
Patricia Nathan + Chie-Mie Chyung123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carolina Backes
21W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
Patricia Nathan
28W–44L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Gloria Suarez-Sanchez
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Meriden Gelb
93W–97L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Holly Lopez
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Rosemarie Sterling
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Cheryl Levin
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
2.60
3
IRMA CAMARENA
3W–13L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60
Maria Angelica Sintes
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
2.58
3
AnaElena Multach
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.54
3
Chie-Mie Chyung
26W–85L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.47
Pamela Hartmann
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.