Teams

LMSI-Siler/Jetton

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 5.5 Men Thurs PM 40s

10 players · average NTRP 2.69 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 10 6:30 PM
at LKMCV-MacVean/CSD 40+ 5.5 Thurs pm
Mark SilerInga Siler
Sep 17 6:30 PM
Jetton Park
Sep 24 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Mark SilerInga Siler
Oct 1 6:30 PM
vs LKMCV-MacVean/CSD 40+ 5.5 Thurs pm
Jetton Park
Oct 8 6:30 PM
Lake Norman Racquet & Social Club
Oct 15 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Mark SilerInga Siler
Oct 22 6:30 PM
at LKMCV-MacVean/CSD 40+ 5.5 Thurs pm
Mark SilerInga Siler
Oct 29 6:30 PM
Jetton Park
2026-08-27vs LREM-Emlong/Russell/LNRSCWon 21
W#1 DoublesTroy Fitzsimmons / Ross Stone Babbit vs Mark Hamm / Brian Jenkins6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJoe Bitel / Ty Niblack vs Ralph Emlong / Charlie Kosior1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Wagner / Erik Kopco vs Sam Russell / Steve Lawson6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesDavid Rosselli / Troy Fitzsimmons vs Baxter Price / David Peeler7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Wagner / Ty Niblack vs Kendall Reische / Keith MacVean4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlan Henderson / Erik Kopco vs Bill Shehane / Kenny Hastings7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Men Thurs PM 40s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Brad Morris
published 3
2.71
Ross Stone Babbit
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Troy Fitzsimmons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
David Rosselli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.58
Alan Henderson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Erik Kopco
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.37
Mark Siler
published 2.5
2.33
Inga Siler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Ty Niblack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.06
Joe Bitel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Troy Fitzsimmons + Ross Stone Babbit224 matchesnot enough data
Mark Siler + Erik Kopco044 matchesnot enough data
Brad Morris + Mark Siler033 matchesnot enough data
Joe Bitel + Ty Niblack033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brad Morris
4W–13L career · type S · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.75
Ross Stone Babbit
3W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Troy Fitzsimmons
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
David Rosselli
4W–7L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Alan Henderson
1W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
2.5
Erik Kopco
12W–28L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
2.5
Mark Siler
13W–28L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
2.5
Inga Siler
31W–82L career · 1 line in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Ty Niblack
8W–19L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Joe Bitel
4W–31L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.