Teams

Causing a Racquet

2026 Corpus Christi RSPA Fall League · Ladies 2.5 Flight

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-30vs Lob StarsLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrenda Aldridge / Alexis Cabrera vs Juanita Hernandez / Marissa Alonzo-Ackerman2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJasmyn Palmer vs Diane Henning6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Aronson / Beverly Cuellar vs Pamela Aleman / Ashley Brown1-6, 0-6
2025-10-23vs Racket RebelsLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Welker / Alexis Cabrera vs Caitlyn Espitia / Diana Keeler1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJasmyn Palmer vs Ashley Bright6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Aronson / Beverly Cuellar vs Jennifer Martinez / Rebecca Milanowski0-6, 2-6
2025-10-09vs Lob StarsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristine Welker / Beverly Cuellar vs Sheri Gagliano / Pamela Aleman2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Hurt / Alexis Cabrera vs Barbara Collins / Marissa Alonzo-Ackerman6-4, 6-4
2025-10-02vs Racket RebelsWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristine Welker / Alexis Cabrera vs Diana Keeler / Jessica Flores3-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJasmyn Palmer vs Ashley Bright6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Hurt / Beverly Cuellar vs Viv Ibarra / Julie Gonzalez7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-09-18vs Lob StarsWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmily Aronson / Brenda Aldridge vs Sheri Gagliano / Pamela Aleman1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJasmyn Palmer vs Juanita Hernandez6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Hurt / Beverly Cuellar vs Shelley Wallach / Barbara Collins6-4, 6-2
2025-09-11vs Racket RebelsLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Welker / Brenda Aldridge vs Jennifer Martinez / Caitlyn Espitia1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJasmyn Palmer vs Rebecca Milanowski6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesEmily Aronson / Alexis Cabrera vs Viv Ibarra / Julie Gonzalez1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Ladies 2.5 Flight
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Racket Rebels4210819141
2Lob Stars339919132
3Causing a Racquet2481021152

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.69
Jasmyn Palmer
usually #1 Singles 73%, also #2 Singles 27% · published
2.08
Beverly Cuellar
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.00
Brenda Aldridge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.84
Alexis Cabrera
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
1.83
Christine Welker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.69
Emily Aronson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jasmyn Palmer
9W–5L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.69
2.5
Beverly Cuellar
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
2.5
Brenda Aldridge
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Alexis Cabrera
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.84
2.5
Christine Welker
3W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.83
2.5
Emily Aronson
0W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.