Teams

RKRTC Team Gold

2024 Adult 55 and Over League · 7.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP / WEST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-11vs RKRTC Team BlueSplit 11
L#1 DoublesHarry Harrison / Richard Vezina vs Vernon Lipscomb / Bob Borns4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRon Rogers / Scott Otteson vs Dennis Yates / Stan Kaneo6-2, 6-3
2024-04-21vs RKRTC Team BlueWon 20
W#1 DoublesWayne Hafstad / Richard Vezina vs Gregory Benson / Kirk Shorte6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHarry Harrison / Ron Rogers vs Dennis Yates / Vernon Lipscomb6-0, 6-0
2024-04-17vs RKRTC Team BlueLost 12
W#1 DoublesRon Rogers / Scott Otteson vs Stan Kaneo / Vernon Lipscomb6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Vezina / Wayne Hafstad vs Bob Borns / Gregory Benson2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesE Kyle Datta / Harry Harrison vs Kirk Shorte / Dennis Yates6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-13vs RKRTC Team BlueWon 21
L#1 DoublesScott Otteson / Ron Rogers vs Bob Borns / Gregory Benson2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesWayne Hafstad / Richard Vezina vs Stan Kaneo / Vernon Lipscomb1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesE Kyle Datta / Harry Harrison vs Dennis Yates / Kirk Shorte6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RKRTC Team Gold31751187
2RKRTC Team Blue134817121

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

E Kyle Datta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Harry Harrison
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Richard Vezina
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ron Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Scott Otteson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stephen Shepard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Wayne Hafstad
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Otteson + Ron Rogers4346% gamesnot enough data
E Kyle Datta + Harry Harrison1536% gamesnot enough data
Richard Vezina + Wayne Hafstad213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

E Kyle Datta
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Harry Harrison
10W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Vezina
7W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ron Rogers
10W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Otteson
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stephen Shepard
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Wayne Hafstad
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.