Teams

LCTA55/Marino/LTPDI

55 & Over · 55 & Over 9.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-05-18vs HHTL55/Budreau/Long CoveLost 03
L#1 DoublesJill Coco / Pamela Cabot vs Janice Budreau / Dava Baumann1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Carter / Bettina Routh vs Vicki Nagy / Tamara Simone5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElleanore Feininger / Bettilee Miller vs Jan O'Neill / Kimberly Alessi1-6, 1-6
2025-05-18vs LCTA55/Elliott/IndependantWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Carter / Nancy Shannon vs Stacy Lilley / Lisa Alexander2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJill Coco / Ann Harrah vs Amy White / Alison Mays6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBettilee Miller / Anna Yates vs Martha Lee / Jennifer Anderson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-17vs CTL55/Horst/CTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnn Harrah / Jill Coco vs Cathy Taylor / Sharon Lewis4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnna Yates / Bettilee Miller vs Rolfe Olsen / Toni Odom4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Carter / Nancy Shannon vs Melissa Prickett / Stacey Hewson4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 9.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Jill Coco
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.26
Ann Harrah
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.15
Nancy Carter
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.11
Bettina Routh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.91
Susie Peiffer
published
3.85
Bettilee Miller
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Pam Marino
published
3.67
Pamela Cabot
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Elleanore Feininger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Shannon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Carter + Susie Peiffer24170% games+10.3% vs expected
Elleanore Feininger + Pamela Cabot224 matchesnot enough data
Bettina Routh + Ann Harrah224 matchesnot enough data
Pam Marino + Nancy Shannon303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Coco
66W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
4.32
4.5
Ann Harrah
39W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
Nancy Carter
30W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Bettina Routh
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
4.11
Susie Peiffer
48W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Bettilee Miller
14W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
Pam Marino
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.70
Pamela Cabot
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.67
Elleanore Feininger
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Nancy Shannon
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.