Teams

Northern: Simply Smashing

2022 55&Over Women · 6.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-09-07vs Acing GracefullyWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathleen Kalmer / Brenda Streeter vs Lauren Nevins / Michelle Larkin3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Bollacker / Nancie Bouck vs Grace Cunningham / Kathleen State6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChrista Ventosa / Vicky Arrington vs Lynn Rogers / Paddi McGrinder1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-08-24vs Forever YoungWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Bollacker / Vicky Arrington vs Gloria Hessell / Gail Beerle6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathleen Kalmer / Brenda Streeter vs Penny Hill / Joanne Boniello6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesShari Calnero / Margot Tohn vs Linda Graf / Roseanne Henley6-2, 6-1
2022-08-22vs Forever YoungWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Bollacker / Nancie Bouck vs Deborah Agresta / Gail Beerle6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Kalmer / Brenda Streeter vs Nanette Litven / Lindsey Loudis6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesShari Calnero / Yvonne Ryan vs Wanda Fischer / Donna Brent6-0, 6-1
2022-08-17vs Lavender JazzWon 30
W#1 DoublesVicky Arrington / Nancie Bouck vs Suzanne Hauber / Cindy Kelly6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Bollacker / Christa Ventosa vs Roseanne Kryjak / Kathleen Kelly6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Ryan / Yvonne Ryan vs Angela Urdanoff / Susan Runkel6-2, 6-4
2022-08-10vs GRETALost 12
L#1 DoublesYvonne Ryan / Brenda Streeter vs Janet Marler / Christine Timber6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Bollacker / Christa Ventosa vs Mary Ann Cooper / Lisa Brainard6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesShari Calnero / Margot Tohn vs Ann Kolakowski / Mary Ann Proper4-6, 2-6
2022-08-03vs Acing GracefullyWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Bollacker / Vicky Arrington vs Sheillagh Egan / Kathleen State6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKathleen Kalmer / Shari Calnero vs Lynn Finke / Marianne Harris6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChrista Ventosa / Susan Ryan vs Karen Mahar / Cindy MacCallum6-2, 7-5
2022-07-13vs Lavender JazzLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Bollacker / Vicky Arrington vs Suzanne Hauber / Deborah Richards6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChrista Ventosa / Shari Calnero vs Roxanne Dejohn / Jane Metzger5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancie Bouck / Teresa Rossi vs Gail Adams / Joyce Tarantino2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-06vs GRETAWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Bollacker / Kathleen Kalmer vs Verna Gerrity / Lisa Brainard7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVicky Arrington / Nancie Bouck vs Mary Ann Cooper / Ann Kolakowski6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesShari Calnero / Margot Tohn vs Catherine Kukan / Margaret Ross Millock6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Michelle Bollacker
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.88
Kathleen Kalmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.85
Christa Ventosa
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.82
Brenda Streeter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Yvonne Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Margot Tohn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Shari Calnero
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Nancie Bouck
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Susan Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Teresa Rossi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Vicky Arrington
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Kalmer + Christa Ventosa13956% games+5.0% vs expected
Kathleen Kalmer + Michelle Bollacker4251% games−0.8% vs expected
Kathleen Kalmer + Shari Calnero4352% games−0.9% vs expected
Yvonne Ryan + Shari Calnero4747% games−8.9% vs expected
Kathleen Kalmer + Brenda Streeter8361% gamesnot enough data
Vicky Arrington + Michelle Bollacker9070% gamesnot enough data
Shari Calnero + Margot Tohn4451% gamesnot enough data
Vicky Arrington + Christa Ventosa314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Michelle Bollacker
155W–90L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3
Kathleen Kalmer
127W–117L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Christa Ventosa
78W–48L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Brenda Streeter
28W–24L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Yvonne Ryan
54W–65L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
Margot Tohn
49W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Shari Calnero
91W–102L career · 6 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
2.71
Nancie Bouck
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Ryan
43W–34L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Teresa Rossi
13W–18L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Vicky Arrington
45W–14L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.