Teams

LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 7.5 40 +

2026 Lake Combo Doubles 40 & Over · 7.5 Women 40s

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-31vs LJHI-Higgins/BaileyWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaryGwen Murash / Leah Rand vs Lauren Woodward / Serena Igharas6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesStefanie Flippin / Jennifer Nogowski vs Cindy Japec / Jennifer Higgins6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMegan Hartley / Cynthia Friess vs Susan Lesso / Kelly Lesso7-5, 6-0
2026-08-24vs LKLR-Riccardelli/WestportWon 21
W#1 DoublesLiz Barton / Megan Hartley vs Rebecca Karner / Bridgett Dedmond3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMollie Lynch / LuAnne Pate vs Christy Bolick / Susie Adams3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Finke / Kelly Hallman vs Leila Riccardelli / Coleen Foye6-3, 6-2
2026-08-17vs LJRO-Rode/SkybrookWon 21
W#1 DoublesMegan Hartley / Liz Barton vs Leta Wiley / Lori Fuller6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Nogowski / Kelly Hallman vs Jane Rodewald / Suzette Watson6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKathryn Burdick / Cynthia Friess vs Amy Barnett / Patty Smith3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 DoublesMichelle Skaggs / Leah Rand vs Janet Novak / Mali Robinson6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesStefanie Flippin / Megan Hartley vs Michelle Potuzak / Nicole Kayton6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMaryGwen Murash / Julie Finke vs Kathy Buaron / Maggie Strevell6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 7.5 Women 40s
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LSCL-Clancy/CRP2042544
2LJJO-Joiner/NMP2051548
3LJFI-FINKE/Bailey 7.5 40 +2042551
4LKLR-Riccardelli/Westport1021317
5LWKI-King/CSD1142444
6LJHI-Higgins/Bailey1142761
7LLRU-Russell-Smith/LNRSC1133861
8LMKPO-Portaro/Jetton1133859
9LSCA-Cantey-Podesta/Peninsula1124861
10LAMC-McRorie-Dudan/Jetton0112427
11LNKA-Kayton-Robinson/CSD SPARTAN 7.50112435
12LNCH-Cheatham/PAC0103638
13LCAP-Aprile/RR0224966
14LJRO-Rode/Skybrook02151165

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Kelly Hallman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Liz Barton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Mollie Lynch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Cynthia Friess
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Stefanie Flippin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
MaryGwen Murash
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Jennifer Nogowski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.53
Michelle Skaggs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Megan Hartley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.47
Julie Finke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
LuAnne Pate
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Leah Rand
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Kathryn Burdick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stefanie Flippin + Kelly Hallman181056% games+0.9% vs expected
Kathryn Burdick + Julie Finke61250% games−4.9% vs expected
Julie Finke + Stefanie Flippin4258% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Skaggs + Julie Finke314 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Burdick + Stefanie Flippin213 matchesnot enough data
Julie Finke + Kelly Hallman213 matchesnot enough data
Julie Finke + Liz Barton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelly Hallman
126W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.92
Liz Barton
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
Mollie Lynch
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Cynthia Friess
97W–72L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Stefanie Flippin
164W–86L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
MaryGwen Murash
133W–111L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Jennifer Nogowski
87W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
Michelle Skaggs
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
41%59%<1%
3.53
Megan Hartley
17W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
Julie Finke
122W–96L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.47
LuAnne Pate
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Leah Rand
84W–96L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Kathryn Burdick
115W–162L career · 2 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.