Teams

Westside Team

TRI-LEVEL 18 & OVER · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-31vs Preisser/ Tri-level 4.0-3.5-3.0/Lost 01
L#2 DoublesWilliam Freed / Jeffrey Haskett vs Tom Acree / Cory Taylor1-6, 1-6
2025-07-24vs Stathis P&R Tri-LevelLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Coplan / David Hurley vs Gunther Heyder / Kevin Zygler7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Farmer / Jeffrey Haskett vs Steve Thompson / Kevin McKeever3-6, 1-6
2025-07-23vs Preisser/ Tri-level 4.0-3.5-3.0/Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Coplan / John del Vecchio vs Marcelo Mora / Mark Preisser2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesThomas Roman / Amit Gupta vs Glenn Rohrbach / Mark Besterci5-7, 4-6
2025-07-13vs Preisser/ Tri-level 4.0-3.5-3.0/Lost 02
L#1 DoublesGregory Wills / Russ Sarbora vs Brian Rubino / Marcelo Mora0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Freed / Thomas Roman vs John Leatherwood / Glenn Rohrbach3-6, 1-6
2025-06-26vs Stathis P&R Tri-LevelWon 20
W#1 DoublesRuss Sarbora / David Coplan vs Kevin McKeever / Kevin Zygler6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesWilliam Freed / John del Vecchio vs Patrik Nemceff / Scott Jolly6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-25vs Preisser/ Tri-level 4.0-3.5-3.0/Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Farmer / Gregory Wills vs Marcelo Mora / Brian Rubino0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Haskett / Sumit Gupta vs Paul Amble / Benjamin Morris3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAmit Gupta / William Freed vs Mark Besterci / Glenn Rohrbach1-6, 0-3
2025-06-18vs Stathis P&R Tri-LevelLost 02
L#1 DoublesRuss Sarbora / Gregory Wills vs Gunther Heyder / Kevin Zygler3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRobert Farmer / Jeffrey Haskett vs Kevin McKeever / Scott Jolly4-6, 3-6
2025-06-12vs Preisser/ Tri-level 4.0-3.5-3.0/Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRuss Sarbora / David Coplan vs Marcelo Mora / Paul Amble1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGregory Wills / David Hurley vs Bo Rhodes / Cory Taylor6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSumit Gupta / William Freed vs Glenn Rohrbach / Mark Besterci4-6, 4-6
2025-06-05vs Stathis P&R Tri-LevelSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRuss Sarbora / Martin Barnette vs Nicholas Stathis / Gunther Heyder6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesGregory Wills / David Coplan vs Steve Thompson / Kevin Zygler7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2025-06-04vs Preisser/ Tri-level 4.0-3.5-3.0/Won 30
W#1 DoublesMartin Barnette / Robert Farmer vs Cory Taylor / Mark Preisser7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSumit Gupta / Jeffrey Haskett vs Benjamin Morris / John Leatherwood4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmit Gupta / William Freed vs Mark Besterci / Glenn Rohrbach6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Martin Barnette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
David Coplan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.38
Jeffrey LaFrance
published
3.36
David Hurley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Russ Sarbora
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
William Freed
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Robert Farmer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Jeffrey Haskett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Gregory Wills
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.11
John del Vecchio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sumit Gupta
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Roman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Russ Sarbora + David Coplan3250% games−3.6% vs expected
Russ Sarbora + Gregory Wills1439% games−12.0% vs expected
Jeffrey Haskett + William Freed123 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Haskett + Gregory Wills123 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Wills + Robert Farmer123 matchesnot enough data
David Coplan + Robert Farmer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martin Barnette
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
3.5
David Coplan
37W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Jeffrey LaFrance
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.38
3.5
David Hurley
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Russ Sarbora
21W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
William Freed
14W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
3.24
Robert Farmer
13W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Jeffrey Haskett
6W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
Gregory Wills
15W–42L career · 5 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
John del Vecchio
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Sumit Gupta
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Roman
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.