Teams

MVC Aleccia SSL A40-4.5WW

2025 WMI SSL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI SSL A40&O 4.5 WW (6 player)

16 players · average NTRP 4.33 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-10vs MVH Post SSL A40-4.5WWWon 21
L#1 DoublesJennifer Aleccia / Marion Rischmann vs Beth Post / Jill Braendle3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Gerling / Rebecca Potluri vs Lynn Bender / Erin Nieves7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Ryan / Becky Musgraves vs Laurie Bos / Emi Mueller6-2, 6-3
2025-04-27vs MVH Post SSL A40-4.5WWWon 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Potluri / Jennifer Gerling vs Beth Post / Jill Braendle7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMaria Kuitula / Sharon Barnes vs Erin Nieves / Laurie Bos1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMarion Rischmann / Heidi Hendricks vs Emi Mueller / Kris Dobrowitsky6-1, 6-2
2025-03-30vs MVH Post SSL A40-4.5WWLost 03
L#1 DoublesDanielle Juhle / Heidi Hendricks vs Lynn Bender / Erin Nieves4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMeera Lee / Marion Rischmann vs Laurie Bos / Jill Braendle1-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesMaria Kuitula / Stephanie Ryan vs Beth Post / Nancy Dancz4-6, 3-6
2025-03-15vs MVH Post SSL A40-4.5WWWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Aleccia / Erin Duffy vs Gabrielle Giertz / Kelly Haskill7-6, 3-0
L#2 DoublesSharon Barnes / Debbie Buchan vs Jill Braendle / Diana Smith1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRebecca Potluri / Marion Rischmann vs Beth Post / Lynn Bender6-4, 6-2
2025-03-09vs MVH Post SSL A40-4.5WWLost 12
L#1 DoublesBecky Musgraves / Natalie Pickup vs Nancy Dancz / Jill Braendle2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRebecca Potluri / Marion Rischmann vs Kelly Haskill / Kris Dobrowitsky6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnna Carlin / Teresa Nelson vs Beth Post / Lynn Bender5-7, 5-7
2025-03-01vs MVH Post SSL A40-4.5WWWon 21
W#1 DoublesErin Duffy / Danielle Juhle vs Lynn Bender / Erin Nieves3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDebbie Buchan / Rebecca Potluri vs Nancy Dancz / Jill Braendle2-6, 4-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Aleccia / Anna Carlin vs Laurie Bos / Gabrielle Giertz6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WMI SSL A40&O 4.5 WW (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MVC Aleccia SSL A40-4.5WW429918152
2MVH Post SSL A40-4.5WW249919161

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Danielle Juhle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Rebecca Potluri
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.10
Anna Carlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Debbie Buchan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Natalie Pickup
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.02
Becky Musgraves
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.94
Marion Rischmann
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.91
Heidi Hendricks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.86
Sharon Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Teresa Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Maria Kuitula
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Jennifer Aleccia
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Meera Lee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Erin Duffy
published
Jennifer Gerling
published
Stephanie Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Barnes + Jennifer Aleccia7079% games+11.5% vs expected
Natalie Pickup + Teresa Nelson6076% games+10.6% vs expected
Sharon Barnes + Teresa Nelson5263% games+7.1% vs expected
Sharon Barnes + Meera Lee6259% games+2.0% vs expected
Jennifer Aleccia + Debbie Buchan19269% games+1.6% vs expected
Natalie Pickup + Becky Musgraves261157% games+1.4% vs expected
Sharon Barnes + Debbie Buchan33862% games+1.3% vs expected
Becky Musgraves + Teresa Nelson9551% games+1.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Danielle Juhle
58W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Rebecca Potluri
43W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Anna Carlin
96W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Debbie Buchan
166W–66L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
4.09
4
Natalie Pickup
133W–55L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
4.5
Becky Musgraves
137W–79L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
Marion Rischmann
50W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.94
Heidi Hendricks
26W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.91
Sharon Barnes
174W–58L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.86
Teresa Nelson
70W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.84
Maria Kuitula
80W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%5%95%
3.72
Jennifer Aleccia
112W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.72
4
Meera Lee
111W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Erin Duffy
18W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Gerling
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Ryan
34W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.