Teams

Tri Hittin’ That!

2023 Fall Adult 18 & Over Tri-Level · Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Amber Jordan
published 4.5
3.81
Nicole Bell
published
3.69
Tanya Thornton
published
3.60
Angela Waterman
published 4
3.42
Julie Madsen
published
3.31
Stacy Kelly Girton
published
Kim Harris
published
Lezli Harrell
published
Stephanie Rodriguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Kelly Girton + Kim Harris5062% gamesnot enough data
Amber Jordan + Stephanie Rodriguez314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Madsen + Angela Waterman213 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Kelly Girton + Angela Waterman213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amber Jordan
71W–80L career · no lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.90
Nicole Bell
81W–33L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Tanya Thornton
63W–65L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Angela Waterman
40W–74L career · type A · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.60
Julie Madsen
70W–76L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
3.42
Stacy Kelly Girton
57W–29L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Kim Harris
53W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lezli Harrell
12W–31L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Rodriguez
45W–41L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.