Teams

NNM 4.0M VR - Romero

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over League - NNM · 4.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-27vs NNM 4.0M SV - FeliceWon 21
L#1 DoublesMark Carlisle / Paul Pfeiff vs Joseph Felice / Eloy Baca6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMario Moreno / Michael Johnson vs Terry Cleveland / Ramon Gallego6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJerome Romero / Steve Gutierrez vs Carl Hohsfield / James Palmer6-4, 6-3
2022-03-23vs NNM 4.0M - NDB O'ConnellLost 13
L#1 DoublesPaul Pfeiff / Mario Moreno vs Brian Renvall / Freddy Gordon0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesGabriel Salazar vs Marck Wright6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Carlisle / Jerome Romero vs Francisco Certain / Bob Gonzalez1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Gutierrez / Michael Johnson vs John Wills / Keith Kollarik4-6, 1-6
2022-03-20vs NNM 4.0M LA - KurennoyWon 21
W#1 DoublesGabriel Salazar / Mark Carlisle vs Gilbert Ratliff / Sean Stanfield6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPaul Pfeiff / Michael Johnson vs Volney Hildreth / Tom Burr6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJerome Romero / Steve Gutierrez vs Sergey Kurennoy / Paul Koehler2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-03-17vs NNM 4.0M SV - FeliceWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Pfeiff / Mark Carlisle vs Eloy Baca / Ramon Gallego5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichael Rigley vs Robert Bustos6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJerome Romero / Steve Gutierrez vs Michael Sanchez / Terry Cleveland7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-14vs NNM 4.0M TCA - BarnesLost 13
L#1 DoublesMario Moreno / Paul Pfeiff vs Mark Friedman / Peter Lorenz1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesGabriel Salazar vs Ian Melville2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Rigley / Jerome Romero vs Romel Sanchez / James Schloss2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Johnson / Dean Carrick vs Garth Olson / Mike Rising3-6, 2-6
2022-03-08vs NNM 4.0M TCA - BarnesLost 13
L#1 DoublesPaul Pfeiff / Dean Carrick vs Mark Friedman / Patrick Widener4-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesGabriel Salazar vs Romel Sanchez6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Carlisle / Steve Gutierrez vs Eli Lee / Andrew Barnes1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Rigley / Jerome Romero vs Patrick Sullivan / Ryne Thompson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2022-03-06vs NNM 4.0M LA - KurennoyWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichael Johnson / Paul Pfeiff vs Volney Hildreth / Kwan Lee1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSteve Gutierrez vs Gregory Cunningham7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMark Carlisle / Jerome Romero vs Paul Koehler / Sergey Kurennoy6-4, 6-2
2022-03-03vs NNM 4.0M - NDB O'ConnellLost 13
L#1 DoublesJON SNELL / Michael Rigley vs Chris Charrlin / Freddy Gordon3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesGabriel Salazar vs Brian Renvall5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMario Moreno / Paul Pfeiff vs Jesus Ontiveros / Chris Hood4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteve Gutierrez / Mark Carlisle vs Daniel Ferguson / Marck Wright6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM 4.0M TCA - Barnes7125716199
2NNM 4.0M - NDB O'Connell7124819204
3NNM 4.0M VR - Oltmans62201230282
4NNM 4.0M EG - Martin53201229272
5NNM 4.0M TCA - Goradia44161638289
6NNM 4.0M VR - Romero35161641318
7NNM 4.0M SV - Felice2652756340
8NNM 4.0M HP - Gee17112146335
9NNM 4.0M LA - Kurennoy17102250329

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gabriel Salazar
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Mark Carlisle
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.45
Mario Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Steve Gutierrez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Jerome Romero
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.22
Paul Pfeiff
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Dean Carrick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Rigley
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Rigley + Jerome Romero4159% games+12.2% vs expected
Mario Moreno + Steve Gutierrez5359% games+6.9% vs expected
Mario Moreno + Jerome Romero2447% games+6.4% vs expected
Steve Gutierrez + Jerome Romero11257% games+0.8% vs expected
Mark Carlisle + Steve Gutierrez2540% games+0.1% vs expected
Paul Pfeiff + Mark Carlisle11852% games−0.4% vs expected
Paul Pfeiff + Jerome Romero5645% games−2.3% vs expected
Mark Carlisle + Jerome Romero8451% games−2.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gabriel Salazar
48W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mark Carlisle
62W–60L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
Mario Moreno
63W–58L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Steve Gutierrez
131W–188L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%67%32%
3.44
Jerome Romero
147W–123L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
Paul Pfeiff
91W–109L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Dean Carrick
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Rigley
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.